The Saudis have threatened to lend political support to the Sunni insurgency in the current sectarian struggle in Iraq. This is because the Saudis depend heavily on support from the Wahabi, an Islamic fundamentalist movement with strong ties to Al Queda. Which is odd, since Al Queda's top priority right now is overthrowing the Saudi monarchy. On the other side is the Shi'ite insurgency, supported by the Ayatollah in Iran and Hasbullah in Lebanon, both committed to the violent overthrow of Israel, our other ally in the Middle East. So the playing field is filled with literally dozens of groups who are committed to each other's violent end, and who are willing to ally with us only in so far as we support their immediate agenda: killing somebody else. Does anybody seriously think there's a political solution in there somewhere?
2007-03-07
06:43:02
·
2 answers
·
asked by
abram.kelly
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Here's my solution: create a sea of radioactive glass from Casablanca to Islamabad. That's right, glass; it's what happens when sand gets really, really hot.
Either push The Button and get it over with, or get the hell out of the region and quit pretending like we've got a pair.
2007-03-07
06:43:59 ·
update #1
Roshni: Thanks for answering, but I think you missed the point. Arabs have been fighting since long before the US occupation of Iraq. Are you going to claim that the Sunni-Shi'ite conflict is the Americans' fault, too?
What I'm saying is that it would be in America's best interests to permanently "neutralize" the threat posed by escalating violence and terrorism in the Middle East. And it might be in your own best interests, too. We'll call it a Holy War - that way all the Muslims who die from the ensuing nuclear winter will go straight to heaven and receive a bunch of virgins, right?
2007-03-07
11:25:22 ·
update #2