Would conservatives agree with this statement?

Question

"Because George Bush is our President, he should not be blamed for any missteps made in the management of this war."

Answer 1

I seriously doubt they would. My guess would be they would agree with the statement though

"Because George Bush is our President, there have been no missteps in the management of this war."

Because in your statement, they would have to admit there were mistakes made; but in the second statement they can still claim that everything is going swimmingly (which being that it is a desert, suggests even more that they are out of touch with reality).

Answer 2

No I would not agree. In order for government to function properly we must hold our leaders properly accountable. I don't believe that Presidents should be blamed for everything that happens in the country just by virtue of the fact that they hold the office at the time, but if it is something to which they have a direct effect on then absolutely. No one can say that a President does not directly effect policy and strategy relating to a war. If anyone were to make this argument I would say that they are deluded. The war may not be the only matter on the President's plate at any given time, but it better be one of the most important at all times when our troops are in harm's way. If mistakes are made then the President must shoulder his share of the burden and blame.

Answer 3

He should be blamed for missteps that he has contributed to. The few that I see are:

He should have sold this war better to the American people.

He should have tried to keep politics out of the war.

He should let his Generals make all decisions on the battlefield.

Perhaps surging troops sooner would have helped, but there is no real way to tell.

He should not be blamed for mis-guided bombs, US troops raping or killing Innocent people, nor the length of time it is taking.

If it is some misstep directly related to decision he has made, sure blame the guy, if not then STFU.

Answer 4

This is a rather convoluted question. Yes, we need to support our President, whether he's Bush or, gulp, Hillary. But if a President makes a "misstep" in anything, including a war, of course s/he should be blamed for it. Does that mean impeachment or any of the other nonsense liberals have been yelling for years? No, not unless s/he actually breaks the law, like Bill did when he lied to a grand jury. Yes, we should support our President, but our support should not be blind. I hope that explains it.

Answer 5

Do not agree. War in Iraq a mistake, Bush definitely needs to take some blame.

Answer 6

i do no longer consider that fact for 2 motives. First, marriage isn't a genuine, it particularly is a privilege, as defined in U.S. regulation. A authentic is something that voters are granted by skill of the form; as an occasion, you have the the main suitable option to vote once you turn 18 because of the fact the twenty 6th modification says you could. A privilege is an interest that the state facilitates voters to do presented they meet the factors set by skill of the state to have interplay in it; utilising a motor vehicle is the main uncomplicated privilege interior the country. Do you think you have a Constitutional authentic to force a motor vehicle? We as a society party and are available to a determination what the factors for those privileges are going to be by skill of direct referendum or electing representatives that replicate our evaluations. 2d, the interracial marriage remark is unconstitutional under the fifteenth modification. If 2 people meet the all different standards for the granting of the privilege, it may't be denied in step with race.

Answer 7

The guy at the top is held responsible no matter what happens. Jimmy Carter was held responsible for the Iran student hostage situation. Carter had nothing to do with taking the students and could not get them released lest they be killed by their captors. He finally negotiated their release just hours before he left office.

Gas prices were high in Carter's administration too. He inherited much of it from Nixon and Ford but when we sat in long lines for gas it was Carter's fault. He didn't raise the cost of oil and he didn't stop the oil from being transported or pumped. It was his fault because the buck stopped at his office.

Bush, doesn't want to stop the buck but pass it along. That will backfire more than it has already. In '08 Republicans will drop like flies.

Answer 8

Absolutely not, and I am a conservative.
ps - He has taken the blame for the missteps, but had Daddy Bush taken hold of the reigns and then left the legacy to Clinton... Clinton's administration could have fixed this mess as well. It's the sins of the former president that affect the current one.

Answer 9

sadly, blinded by their brainwashed allegiance, conservatives will not acknowlege that bush has or ever will make a misstep despite how horrible things get. therefore, it is easy for them to disagree with your statement.

Answer 10

Clearly, yes... because he deserves all of the fame and none of the blame in their eyes.

Remember, these aren't really bombs going off... they're pinjatas filled with candy in the neo-con mind.

Tom: Bush has taken responsibility for his mistakes? What reality are you living in? This is the guy who responded to the question "Can you think of any mistakes you've made?" responded "I can't think of a single one!"