Several systems ranked USC as #1, the one that I personally enjoyed the most was ESPN's because they had Florida as #1 almost all day and then at like 3pm they changed it so USC was #1. UF fans freaked and asked why b/c SC hadn't gotten anyone else and Florida didn't lose anyone....so what happened? ESPN looked at the classes and even though the computer spat UF out as #1 they realized that USC's class was superior and that USC had gone for quality and got it. UF certainly had a great class too, so its hard to decide, but I'd agree that USC was better because they wern't aiming to get 27 recruits, they didn't need it. They'd prefer ten 5-stars to 100 3-stars. So whatever, its undecided as always but USC is deffinetly a finalist. FIGHT ON
2007-03-07 16:35:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jake N 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No one is weaker than Notre Dame, I'm sorry. They're pansies and I have proof. They're not in a conference, meaning NO real competition. Notre Dame plays only TWO REAL football teams, which are the Michigan Wolverines and the USC Trojans. Notre Dame always has been over rated, and will remain over rated until they get a real schedule and join a conference.
As of USC having the best recruiting class. Yes they do. They're picked up some majorly beastly players. Namely a running back who was the top high school running back in the nation and pretty much all real programs were trying to pick him up, USC got him.
2007-03-07 08:52:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by squad9_7 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Dude its not about numbers.. Its quality not quantity.. and I feel the SEC has the best players overall in college football.. USC is getting the number 1,2 and 3 rated high school players in the country.. I say they have the better recruiting..
2007-03-07 09:13:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Beau Christopher 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree. fact of the matter even though FL has some great recruits, usc is gonna enter the season as the number one simply because it got the BETTER PLAYERS in the recruiting was. they also got the back of their future in knight. they got nothing but quality.
2007-03-07 05:47:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
genuinely no. you will argue that USC have been given the superb classification, yet in accordance to each and all of the professional scores, Florida have been given #a million and USC grew to become into #2. the two way, they have been given a stacked classification of recruits as quickly as back, you're genuine. This in basic terms is going to coach that in case you play in between the "significant" severe college soccer states (Florida, California, Texas, Georgia, and Ohio) and you dominate the in-state expertise, and additionally sign some great time recruits that are actually not from the section......you will stay sturdy 3 hundred and sixty 5 days in and 3 hundred and sixty 5 days out. communities like Tennessee don't have this luxurious because of the fact the expertise in Tennessee severe college soccer is horrific. so as that they might desire to get eighty% of their recruits from different components of the rustic. USC, Florida, Florida State, Miami, Georgia, Ohio State, USC, and UCLA could have numerous expertise by technique of signing in state potentialities on my own, in spite of the actuality that USC and a few different of those colleges have a competent music checklist with signing blue chips national to boot. it variety of feels to be no longer honest that USC keeps loading up like this, whether it particularly is often because of the extensive expertise pool genuine there in California, alongside with Pete Carrol being an unreal recruiter and coach. i'm no longer a huge fan of USC in any respect, yet you may provide them credit. you are able to talk approximately their time table, you are able to hate all of them you want, yet their consistency in stocking the team with expertise is astounding. to SPACEBOY: this is just one website......in case you seem on different web pages florida has truer ten, blue chips, and so on.....florida is consensus quantity a million common and in genuine potentialities....they signed anybody! yet USC is extremely close in the back of, im in basic terms saying you cant go by technique of one website. a million of them has jimmy clausen as #a million common, and yet another a million has him 12th! (as a number of them want the west coast potentialities extra, and so on)...it particularly is puzzling to rank those adult males who play in diverse components of the rustic in severe college
2016-09-30 08:26:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by celia 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you look at Florida's WHOLE recruiting class they have the best COMPLETE recruiting class in the country. It's easy for USC to have such a high rating when they only have 18 signees... that's obvious. Florida's is going to be lower when they have more players.
2007-03-07 10:44:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Christopher B 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
First, Florida is better than USC an ND, ALWAYS! Second, They are always overrated and third, FL has tougher schedule than them, since SEC is the hardest one in the country, th have Florida, Auburn, Alabama, LSU, Arkansas and many more. Also FL has the best future QB, Tim Tebow. Besides Mcnight is a total mess and corruption...
2007-03-07 11:02:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
You got to remember that USC plays in a weaker conference so their recruits will look better when they play
2007-03-07 07:54:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋