2007-03-07 04:55:56 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
A disagreement is a difference of opinion. It has nothing to do with critical reading. You can recognize a book as being well-written or poorly written without agreeing with the ideas themselves. I don't personally like Herman Mellville, but I can recognize why his writing is among the classics.
Critical reading means that you are looking at a work with a critical (i.e. objective) eye. Does the plot flow logically? Do the characters behave in a realistic manner? Does the author use appropriate grammar? Critical reading doesn't just say a book was good or bad, it provides reasons why.
2007-03-07 05:05:31 · answer #1 · answered by bardsandsages 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, critical reading is:
Non-critical reading is satisfied with recognizing what a text says and restating the key remarks.
Critical reading goes two steps further. Having recognized what a text says , it reflects on what the text does by making such remarks. Is it offering examples? Arguing? Appealing for sympathy? Making a contrast to clarify a point? Finally, critical readers then infer what the text, as a whole, means , based on the earlier analysis.
2007-03-07 13:01:04 · answer #2 · answered by crzywriter 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
a criticism can be positive or negative - its comments that reflect your opinion on the subject
2007-03-07 15:08:36 · answer #3 · answered by t24 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No; it has to do with analyzing and evaluating something.
2007-03-07 13:11:50 · answer #4 · answered by Maryfrances 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it isn't
2007-03-07 20:01:12 · answer #5 · answered by Can music save your mortal soul? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋