I don't know why they continue to make these movies over 2 1/2 hours. They could have easily chopped off 1/2 hour. I still did enjoy the movie.
2007-03-07 04:48:02 · 5 answers · asked by floridaguy 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Not at all! No good movie is too long and no bad movie is too short. I loved the fact that "Zodiac" took its time and let the feeling sink in. I mean, the killer terrorized the Bay Area for years. The movie needs to be long to give you a sense of how prolonged the whole investigation was.
2007-03-07 06:10:40 · answer #1 · answered by Film Jedi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I haven't seen the movie yet but 2 and a half hours is short compared to the old movies like Gone With the Wind. That's 4 hours long and when they showed it in the theaters, they'd have a short intermission after the first 2 hours.
I'm glad that you recommend this movie. I was debating whether or not to see it since our local paper, The Detroit News, gave it only a C grade--unlike People Magazine (3 out of 4 stars) and Time with a "thumbs up".
2007-03-07 12:54:40 · answer #2 · answered by HoneyBunny 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was long, but not too long. The film was a crime epic. It showed viewers the major aspects of the Zodiac saga: the crime, investigation, sensation, and obsession.
2007-03-07 13:50:58 · answer #3 · answered by Roland 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too bad I haven't watch the movie but I'll do it this week-end.
2007-03-07 12:55:48 · answer #4 · answered by Jersey girl on Florida. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't care for this movie. It was too long and boring in most parts for me.
2007-03-07 13:25:06 · answer #5 · answered by Saucy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋