YES,INDIA SHOULD BE CAREFUL ABOUT BANGLADESH. COMPARING TO THE WEAK TEAMS IN EACH GROUP BANGLADESH IS LITTLE STRONGER THAN OTHER TEAMS.
2007-03-07 23:19:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by sachinram 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Someone above said it correct. Since India and Sri Lanka have safe place on super 8, it is indeed a bad-luck for Bangladesh team to be in their group.
1. Bangladesh
2. Bermuda
3. India and
4. Sri Lanka
will play at Queen's Park Oval, Port of Spain, Trinidad.
However, great upsets are not unknown in cricket though here chances for Bangladesh can be at best 10%.
In any case, I would be rooting (encourage by applause or support) by for our boys - the Bengal tigers!
2007-03-08 13:16:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Hafiz 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bangladesh is playing good. maybe they win up to 60% matches in last 5/6 months on the other side India is not that much good team cuz of their balling side.
Surely both Sri-lanka, Pakistan and India is one of the best Team of the world cup but India is not that much good to win the cup i think.
Wish best of luck to all the South Asian Team.
i will be happy to see a South Asian Worldcup Winner Team.
2007-03-10 17:36:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is a big difference in beating new zealand and india. just other day india beat west indies and they only scored 86 runs...all out....does that mean that pakistan shouldn't worry about west indies on the 13th march? i'll let you answer that question.
bangladesh is a weak team but it is the strongest amongst the weak teams.....ireland, holland, bermuda, canada, and scotland. so obviously india will be careful of bangladesh but the chances of bangladesh winning are slim.
2007-03-10 01:10:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pro Bush 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well if Bangladesh beat Australia, Sri Lanka and now New Zealand..... everybody better watch out for the bengali tigers..
2007-03-08 00:17:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Peach 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
i replaced into watching the experience on television and that i replaced into extremely feeling so undesirable that as quickly as the mandatory run-value replaced into approximately 15 our gamers Mahmudullah and Nasir replaced into attempting to play like a 'attempt-experience' by using saving their wickets and going for singles. What incorrect might have got here approximately in the event that they might attempt to objective for 4s and 6s and then get formidable-out, stamped or caught, in spite of (not run-out however) the way their go out could have been, yet our score card might have jumped and new batsman could have taken it to bigger plateau than what we've been given with 9 wickets intact and lost the sport. Who will tell those boys the version of temperament one might show on an identical time as playing attempt, ODIs and T20s? A heartbroken fan!
2016-10-17 12:00:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by shakita 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't take the warm up matches seriously, after all England did manage to beat Bermuda! India will be a danger to all with their batting line-up.
2007-03-07 05:04:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by G C 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I didn't like cricket untill, I start watching a little, and well it's insane sport and I like it. I'm actually a Bangali and well, I geese that would be cool if they faced each other and India lost.
2007-03-07 04:39:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by zerasithlord 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes indeed. Although they need to be careful throughout the tournament, but definitely they need to be careful in the second round, because the competition would be tougher then.
2007-03-07 05:27:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vijay_Srini 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
forget it! India is going to win the cup this time!
2007-03-08 22:14:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋