GLOBAL WARMING! I'm glad someone else sees this as pathetic as I do! SERIOUSLY, couldn't the democrats come up with anything better than THAT? It didn't work in the 70's and it's not going to work now! If you're a naive democrat who doesn't believe me, then explain how your party tried to link global warming to the terrorist attacks on 9/11. Their logic was this: global warming creates poverty, poor people attacked us, therefore global warming is responsible for the attacks. HELLO! Those men had college degrees, how many POOR PEOPLE have those?? THIS IS JUST A SCARE TACTIC BY THE DEMOCRATS DURING THE YEAR BEFORE AN ELECTION. THINK,PEOPLE, THINK!!
2007-03-07 04:34:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Roland'sMommy 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
good to invite questions. have you ever questioned WHY the aspects differences? specific, the aspects replaced over tens of millions of years, in spite of if it does not ensue by using magic. The regulations of physics prepare. contained in relation to climate, it differences in accordance to incoming and outgoing potential, the quantity the earth gets from the solar and the quantity of greenhouse gases interior the ambience that maintain many of the potential. Over tens of millions of years, the area of the continents and oceans are large aspects. so some distance as greenhouse gases are worried, whilst CO2 is low, we've ice an prolonged time, whilst CO2 is intense we've heat sessions. The differences of CO2 are the two organic, contained in relation to ocean soaking up or freeing CO2. greater presently the quantity of CO2 has resent by using human beings burning coal and oil. so some distance as climate is worried, it does not care the place the CO2 comes from, it somewhat is nonetheless a greenhouse gas.
2016-10-17 11:59:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by shakita 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah, that does not expalin why NASA studies have shown that the whole solar system is warming. It is simply a cycle and has very little to do with humans. The gov's goal is to take our freedoms away somehow with this.
2007-03-07 04:42:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Luke F 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
According to the UN (Livestock’s Long Shadow—Environmental Issues and Options) it's cows have more effect on global warming then humans or cars. According to PETA "You can't be a meat-eating environmentalist.
2007-03-07 04:27:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by JB 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
If you are not emitting CO2 you are killing the environment. The trees that the environmentalist like to hug need the CO2 we produce to survive. So now I'm supposed to drive a Prius, not eat meat, and use florescent lights and solar panels in my house. Were did my Civil Liberties go?
2007-03-07 04:35:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by mbush40 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
As good a theory as any I guess. I always knew all that self important hot air from the environmentalists who refuse to even honestly examine any alternative position had to have some negative impact.
2007-03-07 04:34:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bryan 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Did you know it is not a fact at all but rather an inconvenient lie? See National Geographic article about Mars ice caps warmimg. It's Solar related dude. Wake up and smell the coffee.
2007-03-07 04:28:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by aiminhigh24u2 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Thank you for the sarcasm addition. These days on this board, I can't tell.
Good one!
2007-03-07 05:23:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pretty soon they will prove that breathing causes Global Warming. We better watch out!
2007-03-07 04:28:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
its not oging to matter if humans stop reproducing... soon we are going to find a cure for every disease and everyone will live forever... screw evolution.. we'll use drugs and chemicals to make us live FOREVVVVVVVVER
2007-03-07 04:27:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by nothing 5
·
1⤊
0⤋