English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I also don't care about Hillary Clinton's land deals or even the futures trade from 20 years ago.

One of Obama's investments in question was a $5,000 investment. In common stock. It was a biotech firm but gee whiz, what's the most he can make on that, given that the sector was already overpriced?

I think these little chicken-**** issues distract from the real problems with the leading Democrats - that either Obama or Hillary Clinton will dramatically ratchet up the federal government's involvement in and direction of the economy and that either of them will raise tax rates - not necessarily raising revenue, just punishing success.

You have to pick your battles. Go after these two for being unabashed socialists, not for their small investments. I don't care if there are a few irregularities in how they make their money - I care about them trying to TAKE MY money.

2007-03-07 04:11:02 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

2 answers

Unabashed socialists? Because they want to help middle class America rather than line their pockets?
I agree with what you said about picking your battles, though.

2007-03-08 18:42:22 · answer #1 · answered by london_clash 2 · 0 0

You mistake the party you have taken up with.
Their aim is to cloud the issues, not fight them head-on.

Expect some smarmy buzz-phrase about stocks - but not issues.

2007-03-07 16:59:16 · answer #2 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers