English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Clearly, the Socialist Insane Asylum currently run under the pseudonym "Vermont" is being run by the inmates...should their paltry contributions to the rest of the world be ignored?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070307/pl_nm/bush_vermont_impeach_dc

2007-03-07 02:46:24 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

There are some great answers folks - keep em coming...seems I’ve hit a nerve

2007-03-07 03:04:19 · update #1

26 answers

Haven't been there in a long time and don't plan on it either. They have been very liberal for a long time, not far behind California. They are their own breed.

To another answer, boycotts work. It hits them in the wallet. Ever notice how french wine has lost it's desire in America. A good American wine and Australian wine finds it's way into my home now. I am one of those that will not buy something or go somewhere if it goes against my belief. There are people out there that put their money where their heart is. Why put money into something that is against what you believe or is immoral or unethical? I don't understand that. I may do so unknowingly, but I do my best to stay informed.

I use the liberal website buyblue.org to help me to determine which companies support those that I don't like. When we looked for auto insurance, we didn't get Progressive, they donated over $3 million to a party that I feel is totally unethical and bad for this Country. Citgo, many people boycotted them and the staff said that they saw a decline in customers. Now that they have changed from Citgo, their business is doing great. Some can criticize and say conservatives boycott, but not only we do, liberals do too. Those that boycott are taking a stand against something that is against what they feel or believe. It is also our freedom to do so.

2007-03-07 03:15:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

You wouldn't like Vermont anyway. It's filled with progressive thinkers.

The impeachment is kinda screwy cause that will never happen. Not sure we should tie up legal actions on something designed to just bring attention to the subject.

Probably better fish to fry in all honesty.

2007-03-07 02:55:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I applaud the people of Vermont for stating up and speaking out for what they believe in, after all that is what America is about freedom to speak your mind, and fight for what you believe in (through legal and diplomatic channels) Exactly what Vermont is doing.

I find the mentality of trying to silence a group of Americans for having an opinion that may not coincide with your own both dangerous and distinctly UN-American.

If you would like to stop buying Maple Syrup fo right ahead. Don't expect many other to follow in your lunacy.

2007-03-07 02:54:40 · answer #3 · answered by smedrik 7 · 5 4

Nope.
I think we should offere Vermont a choice.
If you really want to bring our troops home they have to go and replace them.

I don't think Vermont should be boycotted.
I think it would be great shutdown Gitmo put a fence around Vermont and those Muslim terrorists we catch we release them into Vermont so they can show how to take care of them.

2007-03-07 02:56:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Put contributions aside, not that they aren't important but,,,
Does it surprise you that they hold the hands of child rapists while they spout their socialist propaganda.

Vermont is no longer a part of civilized society . Any state that protects pedophiles from prosecution is trash to me .

to support Vermont is to support child rape. BOYCOTT EVERY THING FROM VERMONT UNTIL THEY START PROTECTING THEIR CHILDREN FROM THE TRASH THEY'RE CODDLING.

PEDOPHILES MUST BE LINING UP TO MOVE THERE.

AAH,, THE BENEFITS OF LIBERALISM.

2007-03-07 03:39:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

I will never give up my ben and Jerry Chunky Monkey ice cream .How long before Bush sends in the troops to Vermont???

2007-03-07 02:51:24 · answer #6 · answered by prole1984 5 · 9 3

Why? For standing up for what they believe in? I don't think so. In fact, I think the whole USA should stand with Vermont and, at the least, stand up for what we believe in.

Illegal immigrants are taking over the USA along with their supporters and those who aide and abett them. Now the churches are stepping in with their vow of sanctuary for these lawbreakers. Is that fair to all of the U.S. Citizens who obey the law?

I think it's wonderful that Vermont is standing up for what they believe in. Also, I think other states should join them.

2007-03-07 02:55:02 · answer #7 · answered by MH/Citizens Protecting Rights! 5 · 6 4

"Boycotted?"

Whatever for? For politically expressing themselves and for being brave enough to call a criminal a criminal?


Just like a Republican......the only thing that means anything to you people is money-related. Boycott? Be my guest.

2007-03-07 02:51:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 4

It should be relocated to Texas.

2007-03-07 03:04:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Eh, who wants to go to Vermont anyway?? Not I.

2007-03-07 02:53:46 · answer #10 · answered by J S 4 · 5 5

fedest.com, questions and answers