We are not spending that money for Sadam. We are spending it for George Bush's ego.
More trees, less Bush.
2007-03-07 02:38:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Larry 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not at all - Iraq/Ba'ath Party/Saddam was never a direct threat to the US or US-interests in the Persian Gulf - Iran was and always will be. That's why the US is in the region - to prevent what it perceives as a direct threat to the oil lanes. I am not a war hawk/peace dove - just a realist.
2007-03-07 02:35:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by beer10002 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
What is the cost of staying alive.
Or considering the trillions 9/11 cost.
Since when is freedom has a price tag.
2007-03-07 02:37:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
He WAS, and the war effort is indeed worth what ever it takes. I see the same old Liberal rhetoric appearing about they never directly attacked us boo hoo, boo hoo... what ever. Libs like that do not understand the premise that if you hire and aid someone to kill another person you are just as guilty as they are even though you never actually committed the murder. Duh... but that blows the Liberal rhetoric away with 100% common sense so its taboo... again... what ever.
2007-03-07 02:42:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sane 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yohooo Sadam is dead.
2007-03-07 02:34:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Boston Mark 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Saddam (2 D's) was lynched a while back.
2007-03-07 03:00:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chase 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think we should spend more and send him some toiletries. You know he smells like a goat.
2007-03-07 02:34:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by wwhrd 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
wow! that much??!! i say HELL NO. that money should go to the poor, the homeless, education, health and other that can benefit the society.
2007-03-07 03:40:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by MiSz JaY 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no.This whole war wasnt worth a dime.
2007-03-07 02:33:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well if Blair was,nt up Bushes *** .we need,nt have gone into this.
2007-03-07 02:39:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by spartus54 2
·
0⤊
1⤋