2007-03-07 02:21:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No one was outed. Her status was covert. Also, Rich Armitage was responsible for NOT outing a CIA agent. Nice try libtard.
2007-03-07 02:28:24 · update #1
TYPO-- NOT COVERT
2007-03-07 02:28:40 · update #2
The difference is Bill Clinton was not tried and convicted of perjury by a jury.
2007-03-07 02:49:20 · answer #1 · answered by Tara P 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do you think that a married man should talk on national tv about having an affair? When Bill lied to us about that, it was what any decent man would do.
When Bill testified under oath about the affair, he was honest about it. If you go back and read the questions, they kept trying to trap him. They gave him a list of sex acts and said - did the relationship contain these acts? It didn't, and the list was designed so that they would be able to say he lied about the relationship. The meaning of is silliness is because one of the questions was "Is there a relationship?" Well, the relationship had ended months before, so clinton was asking them, as a lawyer who knew what they were trying to do, did they mean IS or WAS?
Finally, in your mind, denying that you are having an affair is the same as blowing the cover of a CIA operative whose job it is to collect loose NUKES from former soviet republics?
2007-03-07 02:29:23 · answer #2 · answered by cassandra 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The difference is simple: Libby was convicted of the offense. Clinton wasn't.
Sure, "Slick Willy" lied his butt off on camera, but the Demoncrats (and no, that's not a typo) in the Senate kept him from getting convicted by voting along party lines instead of voting for the truth.
2007-03-07 04:08:02 · answer #3 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
we are a u . s . of liars, did you spot Hillary shed a tear? If Hillary became 'stuck' mendacity on tape telling a fat lady she regarded marvelous in that gown, could that be a capital crime? There are lies and there are LIES, like cellular chemical lab lies, like WMD lies, like CIA brokers could properly be outed in the journey that they don't arise with the right lies the administration needs them to. even as i became a woman, admittedly a lengthy time period in the past, a gentleman in no way reported his love existence, now the very undeniable truth that bill did not is added out and its stated as perjury, and the party that insisted he have his sex existence revealed is understood-about because the 'family members values' party. Now it truly is yet another LIE. Juanita Broddrick is yet another lie, she in no way even reported it to the police, she got here out with her tale thirty years later and couldn't save in ideas the date, and he or she had both a lover and a husband she became most suitable on on the time. The FBI investigated her tale and positioned it to be inconceivable. If the Clintons were so reliable at eliminating witnesses, why were Monica, Linda Tripp, Gennifer flora, Paula Jones all allowed to flow on their merry thanks to right this moment, why has Willey revealed a e book that genuinely says 'i became groped"? Who does that?
2016-12-05 09:01:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. What Bill lied about was none of America's business. He was the President of the United States, he deserved to get a BJ every now and then:)
2007-03-07 02:26:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but he didn't do it in court. He just lied in front of the entire United States.
2007-03-07 02:26:37 · answer #6 · answered by panthrchic 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
thats all ya got?
lets just out a C I A agent that likes Bush and see how much you whine then
2007-03-07 02:25:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋