Ok, this might be a new theory, and it might seem a little strange at first but please hear me out.
1. We know that Bush is the ultimate evil.
2. We know that evil never dies.
3. Therefore, Bush is immortal and was alive during the 1830's with hitler.
4. Bush is a rethuglikkkan.
5. Rethuglikkkans molest little boys (we know this from the Foley scandal when he molested all the boys in that catholic school in flordia.)
6. Hitler was once a little boy and a catholic til he was 12.
7. The hitler became evil and made the nazis.
You see its perfect logic. We also know that hitler wasn't full evil, that he tried to resist bushs influence because he also killed the jews. So my question is did bush molest hitler?
2007-03-07 02:17:37 · 14 answers · asked by mmm_billy01 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Jeeze, leave it to the neokkkons to dish out so much hate!
2007-03-07 02:26:54 · update #1
A little strange? Now go take your meds
2007-03-07 02:20:48 · answer #1 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
First of all your logic is a bit skewed. Second of all Hitler was not around in the 1830's but was in the 1930's. What is the first word in #5? I don't recognize it.
No it does not make perfect logic. Just because Hitler and Bush are both evil and Bush's grandad did business with Hitler doesn't mean there is any direct connection between the two men.
2007-03-07 02:33:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You forgot a couple premeses:
1) A person needs to be born in order to molest.
2) When Hitler died, Bush was not born.
Therefore, Bush did not molest Hitler.
Your question is really a thought-provoking one, thouggh. Especially the part of the argument where you extrapolate that all republicans molest children. Logical, really.
2007-03-07 05:36:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Here is the real problem.
1. We know you are a US hating traitor.
2. Be lucky you have a president like Bush, if you were in any other country you would be killed for saying things like this, but I forgot, liberals take for granted where they live.
3. You have got to have absolutely no repect for anything about this country for saying such a retarded statement trying to be humorous.
4. You are probably the child molester, trying to say it was someone else so as to kind of admit it, but not completely so you won't get caught.
2007-03-07 02:23:15 · answer #4 · answered by Chris B 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sorry dude. Hitler was alive during the 1930's. That throws your whole premise out the window.
2007-03-07 02:26:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Everything that you "know" is more like everything you think is fantasy. Sorry, but hearing you out is like trying to hear a three year old's argument. Only the three year old makes more sense.
2007-03-07 02:27:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The answer is no to another "intelligent" question from the Tin Foil Hat brigade!
2007-03-07 05:01:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Although I got a decent chuckle, you really are a waste of oxygen.
2007-03-07 02:26:04 · answer #8 · answered by Beachman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
uhhhh... bush was born way after hitler died. wow, get a life.
2007-03-07 02:28:21 · answer #9 · answered by JoseMaria G 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in this thing we call life, the accusers do what they accuse,others of doing,ie are you a child molester/?,if so get help!
2007-03-07 02:24:12 · answer #10 · answered by tom the plumber 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋