2007-03-07 02:08:23 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
definitly a footballer because they run around a play for 90 min. their legs are strong and they probably work out to match their whole body to their leg strength. Cricketers just hit a ball all day. That doesn't take very much strength.
2007-03-07 02:20:31 · answer #1 · answered by yankee man 21325910 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's definitely footballers cuz they just go on runinng over here and there,whereas the cricketers just remain in the same position and does not have to waste much energy when compared to footballers.
2007-03-07 11:46:26 · answer #2 · answered by amber 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
firstly to people sayin cricketers just stand there, they most certainly do not. fast bowlers run the equivalent of a marathon each day so that takes quite a bit of fitness. however it is not continuous so i would have to say footballers.
2007-03-08 11:42:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
first of all Cricketers only move about 20 yards the whole game, and just stand the rest of the time
2007-03-07 10:11:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Footballer because they have to do a lot more running. I play football and I am really fit.
2007-03-09 15:08:34 · answer #5 · answered by Frank I 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ohh so many to choose from
There is Frank Lampard for starters he is FIT- Football
Freddie - Cricket!!
Oh you mean Fit as in Fitness healthy!! Silly me
2007-03-07 10:19:20 · answer #6 · answered by Peachy Girl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
footballer
2007-03-07 16:19:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
fittest kaka
2007-03-07 10:29:46 · answer #8 · answered by Frihah Anti-Milanist 4lyf! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would say bekham for real madrid.
2007-03-07 10:14:57 · answer #9 · answered by juve is juve 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋