2007-03-07 00:38:26 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
That will lick the problem!
2007-03-07 00:45:00 · answer #1 · answered by confused 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So you're saying that if someone was convicted and sent to prison due to driving without a license or someone convicted of forgery charges due to one check they wrote out, they should have their picture on a stamp? Then have them exposed and subject themselves to harassment and abuse of other individuals who do not know the details of what they were convicted of?
Many people who are in prison or who have been to prison are in there for non-violent crimes. Plus, why do we need more violence and have some individuals decide to take the law into their own hands?
Plus, once a person has paid their debt to society by serving their time, many people become tax paying citizens. Yeah, their conviction stays on their record for a lifetime, but many (not all) had just made a bad mistake, and not always a bad person.
2007-03-07 01:25:37 · answer #2 · answered by Erica, AKA Stretch 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mail man doesn't look at the Addresses, he's going to look at stamps?
Every time I buy on ebay if it's in the mail, it's 3 weeks in arriving (50% of it doesn't get here).
2007-03-07 00:52:42 · answer #3 · answered by Wonka 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i've got been given a actual stable snigger and there is particularly some certainty on your thinking the inponderable. so if the scarecrow has a concepts then he will pick a heart and particularly some braveness whilst fires are around. so why weren't he the only character interior the wizard of oz?
2016-11-23 12:58:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are assuming that the mail carriers (pretty PC, huh?) have time to be looking for wanted suspects while they are on their routes...aren't Police A.P.B.s enough? I can only think of the desire of certain criminals to get their mug shots on a stamp, thus committing further crimes for recognition.
2007-03-07 00:48:12 · answer #5 · answered by WMD 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They have to wait until 10 years after Nixon died to put him on a stamp.
2007-03-07 00:47:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I dont think many postal staff are going to be looking at the stamps they have enough trouble reading the address.
2007-03-07 00:44:46 · answer #7 · answered by frankturk50 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not a bad idea but they probabley couldnt be bothered shouldnt the police just pull their finger out and catch em?
2007-03-07 00:53:06 · answer #8 · answered by bez 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes its a wonderful idea!
They will start this in two months - and guess who the first person on these Special stamps will be!
GEORGE W. BUSH!
2007-03-07 00:47:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I would not be in favor of that. Stamps should be an honor bestowed on those deserving recognition (real or fictitious).
2007-03-07 01:22:51 · answer #10 · answered by 'lil red 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean like Bush, Kissinger, Bush Jnr, Cheney, Rumsfeldt, Perle, Wolfowitz, Bremmer, Weith,Blair? What good would that do?
2007-03-07 00:51:13 · answer #11 · answered by Watcher 465 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋