English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And secondly who is the most likely to invade another country?

2007-03-07 00:34:18 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

I hardly see how it can be a Democract. They're the most terrorist-hugging leftists around.

2007-03-07 00:52:39 · update #1

12 answers

McCain with his military background and combat experience, also a republican. Invasion, I have no idea, but probably a republican.

2007-03-07 00:39:35 · answer #1 · answered by AJ 4 · 0 1

Of the candidates that are running right now, I think Hillary would be the best candidate while Rudy the most likely to invade another country since picking fights seems to be his forte. However, Candidates will come & go, and those who are running right now, may not be by election time, while others will take their place. It is really too early to decide. Only time will tell. The best thing to do right now, is to keep abreast of the issues, be aware of what every candidate stands for, by listening to them & reading everything there is about them from legitimate sources (not ad campaigns or your friends). If everyone did that, hopefully, we'll wind up with the right person. No matter what happens, 2008 promises to be a very interesting & exciting election year.

2007-03-07 09:59:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Duncan Hunter would be a good commander in chief. He fought in Vietnam with the Army Rangers. He was he Chairman of the Armed Services Committee in the House. Mr. Hunter also has a long record as a Solid Conservative.

Whether or not he is most likely to invade another country, depends on the circumstances. He supports Reagan style "peace through strength". So I doubt Mr. Hunter would take options "off of the table".

2007-03-07 09:03:05 · answer #3 · answered by csn0331 3 · 1 0

George Bush was the only president in history to invade a sovereign country for no reason at all. I think Dwight D. Eisenhower was the best commander in chief. I see nobody in the current list of candidates that qualify.

2007-03-07 08:39:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The best team would be Clinton and McCain as her VP. I realise that they are from different parties but they would be a very good team.
I dont think the next President would invade another country without the backing of Congress.

2007-03-07 10:05:39 · answer #5 · answered by Wayne T 1 · 0 0

I would say John McCain. He has the best credentials as a political independent (which also hurts him with the "parties" and why his propoganda machine is in high gear). He has the moxy to put the country first, for a change.

Most likely to invade? no one jumps ahead of the others in my mind.

2007-03-07 11:57:53 · answer #6 · answered by Common Sense 2 · 0 0

John McCain

2007-03-07 09:12:55 · answer #7 · answered by Caleb's Mom 6 · 0 0

Ron Paul.

2007-03-07 13:27:15 · answer #8 · answered by Robert and Tanya 2 · 0 0

Ron Paul, Republican, is really a Libertarian as he believes in FREEDOM and the CONSTITUTION. He's got my vote.

Most likely to continue the killing, in no particular order:
1) Hilary Clinton
1) Obama
1) McCain
1) Any of the other Dems or Reps likely to get nominated

2007-03-07 08:46:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

1 - Mitt Romney
2 - Hillary Clinton - her husband used the military in more countries than any other US president in history.

2007-03-07 19:12:38 · answer #10 · answered by David G 2 · 0 0

Give any Republican pig farmer a gun, make him stand, and he'll probably do OK.
Yeah, same guy would invade Mexico in a flash.

2007-03-07 08:55:24 · answer #11 · answered by Watcher 465 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers