You would never get there. at some point you would have to take a step to cover 100% of the distance left.
2007-03-06 23:32:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by vospire s 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
2
2007-03-06 23:31:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ghajini 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
You would never get there, although you would get very close to that door :-) Well, that is, provided you can always take a step half the distance of the previous step, if there is such thing a smallest possible step, this paradox is resolved.
2007-03-06 23:35:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Steven Z 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you never get there. it's like the half-lives of elements. the amount will keep getting smaller and smaller, but the distance (or element) will never get to zero.
or you could mean half the distance- 2.5 k- and that would be each step, in which case it would be 2.
2007-03-07 05:48:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by resistance fighter1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You never get there. The space between you and the door gets smaller and smaller, but never gets to zero.
2007-03-06 23:32:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Phartzalot 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Forever. You never actually get to the door.
2007-03-06 23:31:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You'll never get there. It has to do with algebra and I hate algebra, so I'm not going to explain my reasoning.
2007-03-07 10:49:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Becca 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where am i exactly? in prision?
2007-03-07 00:26:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Biqo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋