Is perfection in people defined by absence of extremes and rigidity?

Question

Perfection in things denotes absolutes in terms of good quality etc. Is it different when it comes to people.... aren't rigidly idealistic people rather repulsive.... isn't extreme goodness in a person rather burdensome?

Answer 1

Perfection is imperfection in it self when it comes to people. We are not static and unchangeable and if the people surrounding us never change we'll find them less than perfect in the end. Too much of one thing is not a good thing, balance is what people strive for and that's not static balance.

Answer 2

Your question is interesting and thought provoking.
It may very well get a different response from anyone who reads it.
Anyhow! Perfection is ambiguous and likewise extremes and rigidity!
Idealogues are usually opposed by those who have differing views. People who can illustrate thougtful consideration of extremes of others are the most 'perfected' I would think.
I would look at Senator Ted Keddedy as a political liberal and then look at Anne Coulter or Rush Limbaugh as conservative icons as the other extreme and see what's in the middle.
Unfortunately, there are few that can achieve the middle ground. ..thus 'perfection' is rare.
thanks for the question

Answer 3

The Word Perfection is subjective, ask 1000 ppl and they will give you a diferent meaning of perfection, so its up to you to decide what is perfection in terms of people.

For me perfection is something that works.

If your pens writes, its perfect, if it gets dry, then its not perfect anymore, cuz it doesnt serves his purpose.

Answer 4

people are perfectly human. rigidly idealistic people are just people struggling to find meaning in their lives how can that make them repulsive...could it be their behaviors you find so repulsive?