English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and I said it was carried out by the u.s. government and u.s. military based on the evidence?

Here is a guy walking upto a guy saying that with a microphone:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnliRXAIyIo

Check out that clip, its really popular

2007-03-06 18:58:10 · 17 answers · asked by PA Guy 1 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

Well lets see:


1. The democrat party has a history of planning attacks on the American people to further their goals.

Operation NorthWoods

2. Probaly the only company in the US that could have brought down the WTC with demolition charges, is Controlled Demolition Inc.

Controlled Demolition Inc has been charged by the Justice Department with making illegal campain contributions to Congressman Elijah Cummings (D) Maryland.

3. Securacom Inc was replaced as the security contractor for the WTC by E-J Electric Installation Co before 9/11.

Securacom Inc had ties to Marvin Bush, E-J Electric Installation Co CEO is a major Democrat Party donor and regularly donates to Senator Chuck Schumer (D) NY.

4. Larry Silverstein suddenly finds backing to buy the WTC for 3.2 billion dollars 6 weeks before 9/11.

Larry Silverstein is the largest private campain donor to Hillary Clinton.


So we see past history pointing at the democrats.

We see the only company capable with ties to the democrats.

We see the security company with ties to republicans removed from the job and replaced by a company with ties to the democrats.

We see the Clintons, life long residents of Arkansas, suddenly deciding to move to NY.

We see the new owner of the WTC with ties to the Clintons.


Kind of makes ya wonder why people are pointing at Bush.

Seems to me they should be looking at the DNC.

2007-03-06 19:03:54 · answer #1 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 6 1

I would say that you would have to be extremely gullible to believe that since there is NO scientific evidence to support such a claim. Steel weakens at 600 degrees, melts at 1200 degrees. Jet fuel burns from 800-1200 degrees. The WTC were designed to implode if structural damage becomes too much. Federal law requires ALL sky scrapers to implode from structural damage. WTC 7 blew up from a damaged gas main. NO bombs were heard. NO bombs were wired. The alert wing responsible for NYC was moved to Indiana by the failed Clinton Administration and not even at Mach 3 could a fighter jet get to NYC from Indiana in under 10 minutes. Also, yes, the Clinton's did make out financially fom the loss of the WTC towers. Friends of theirs are now collecting billions in insurance money and stocks because of this. In 1999 the Clinton Administration was warned by the CIA, FBI, DoD about terrorists training in America at flight schools. As usual, Clinton did nothing, just like how he refused 3 times to arrest Osama bin Laden.
Then I would laugh at you and walk away, hoping that reality would set in quickly.

2007-03-06 20:30:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Tho this is getting a little boring...I would ppolitely ask you to share the evidence w me as I have already done tonight w three separate people including ZORVOK who posted below.

I'm still waiting w an open mind to have the benefit of what you know. Why won't you show me some tangible proof? Please??

If you have the goods I want to thank you for being the messenger. I SERVED this country for 6 years in the Navy, & am mature & intelligent to know the government doesn't always share everything w the general population. They do deal in some subterfuge &/or lieing by omission.

BUT if you all have the proof GET UP OFF IT FOR THE LOVE OF GOD OR SHUT YOUR PIEHOLE!! Please!!!

BTW unlike all of the conspiracy theorist's you may contact me via email at any time via this site...why do none of you have that feature enabled?? Could I get an answer to that reasonable question??


I stand ready STILL to be enlightened. Quit teasing me!!

2007-03-06 19:32:55 · answer #3 · answered by SantaBud 6 · 3 0

I live in NYC. That actually happens quite a bit around Ground Zero. It's really funny because there's usually another group of people there refuting their "evidence." The conspiracy theorists think the second group is all CIA. One of the CIA agents is actually kinda cute but I never get a chance to talk to her because someone inevitably comes up to me and starts screaming how she's CIA and blames her for toppling some government or other.

Anyways, I usually laugh.

2007-03-06 19:33:24 · answer #4 · answered by mykll42 2 · 3 0

How else could a normal person not under the influence and control of the government deliver a truthful documentary on 9/11? youtube is great means of doing that. But people would rather believe the massmedia. IF you're going to rely on the media for truth you will never have it.

Ofcourse 9/11 was a conspiracy - nobody has the guts to admit it , it means they'd feel obligated to get off their *** and do something about it.

2007-03-06 19:12:17 · answer #5 · answered by zorvok 2 · 0 2

Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the U.S. Government had their hand in the Terror Attacks of 911 are just plain ignorant. It's impossible for Jet fuel or Kerosene to melt iron...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Some idiots will argue that the fires were raging hot inferno’s...however if that was the case then why were there people standing in the holes where the planes impacted waving for help? Their clothes weren’t even burnt. Here we are talking about the biggest crime scene in the history of the United States...and what did Guilani do?
He scooped up all the evidence and got rid of it as fast as he possibly could. Sent overseas to be recycled? I doubt it...my guess is they dumped it all in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.

If any of you people would for one second look at the evidence...it's a common tactic for a country to injure or attack itself and then blame it on the enemy. Then we can go get em. There is even a name for it...it’s called.. “Pretext for Military Intervention” Why don't all you wonderful wise little kids tell me why NORAD didn't scramble any fighters to escort the hijacked planes down? They didn't miss 1, but all 4!! Anytime a commercial airline goes off course without explanation, within 10 minutes, fighter jets are supposed to escort them down. Especially the air space over the Pentagon! Hmmm. How convenient. You think it was because Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the same morning of the attacks? Did you also know that the WTC changed owners about six months prior to the attacks? Did you also know that the buildings were worth more if destroyed than standing? That Larry Silverstein is the man who cashed out on the scam...walking away with billions? Did you know that there was a flurry of activity on Wall Street prior to the attacks, and the majority of the trading was “Put options” on the doomed Airlines stock? Did you know that there were multiple explosions heard inside the buildings from all kinds of firefighters, police officers and witnesses? Did you know that WTC Building 7 fell at approximately 5:30 p.m.? That the building did not suffer any major damage, but it somehow blew up into a fine pile of dust? Do you Morons even know what propaganda is? Do you know that it is also a well known and effectively used tool for the government to pull the wool over your eyes? Well, don't say we didn't warn you when your asking yourself 5 years from now "How could this happen?" It's sheeple people who make it easy for the government to do whatever they want. Educate yourself and open your eyes folks. This is real, and there are more than just a couple of us who think so. Go to google and type in Terror Attacks of 911...have yourself a look at all the choices there are to choose from.

2007-03-06 19:18:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

I would call the authorities and have you put in a straight jacket and taken back to the mental institution.

2007-03-07 05:24:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd walk away from you without saying a word or looking back. Why waste my time on such mindless drivel?

(And if you followed me, I'd hit you with the pepper spray.)

2007-03-06 19:07:32 · answer #8 · answered by WhyAskWhy 5 · 4 0

I would treat you as I do all insane people that approach me on the street. I would walk away from you and ignore that you were talking to me.

2007-03-06 19:06:37 · answer #9 · answered by mamadixie 7 · 5 0

I'd say you were wrong and ask for your evidence. If you used "youtube" as evidence I tell you to get a legitimate source because that's not evidence!

2007-03-06 19:01:55 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 6 1

fedest.com, questions and answers