English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-06 17:43:36 · 4 answers · asked by dcannon 1 in Entertainment & Music Movies

4 answers

Most likely because they decided to ride on the coattails of Alex's success.

Daniel Balwin is good only in roles where he is sort of the "loveable oaf".

Stephen Baldwin should never be cast in the lead as he only works in very limited doses...roles that have worked for him have been minor ones where he didn't have to display much range or dialogue.

Would have to rank Billy Baldwin as the worst of the three...have never found him convincing in any role he has ever been in. He is to Alec as Laytoya Jackson is to Janet Jackson.

Adam Baldwin in a great actor, but is no relation to Alec Baldwin or any of his brothers.

2007-03-07 01:29:48 · answer #1 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 0 0

Stephen isnt real bad, he's had some good roles.

William and Daniel play too few of roles to be taken seriously.

Only Alec has trully made a career out of acting.

with stephen being second

2007-03-06 20:37:13 · answer #2 · answered by clomtancy 5 · 0 0

check out Adam Baldwin's performance in the tv series 'Firefly"...as 'Jane'...the quick shooting merc.
He was made for that role...and in it he is perfect.

2007-03-06 18:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by Zholla 7 · 1 0

coz deep down inside they thought they would make it big in hollywood.

2007-03-06 17:52:23 · answer #4 · answered by aqua_gurl83 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers