It is quite simple, if you ignore the rants of the liberals trying to jump into the limelight:
She said, "I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word "******," so I — so kind of an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards."
EXPLANATION: ABC forced one of their hollywood celebrities to go to rehab for calling a costar "******". Therefore, Ann could not use any language or insults (not specifically that word) when talking about Edwards, as she does not have anything nice to say about him. SHE DID NOT CALL HIM THAT TERM!!!!
Are liberals too dense to understand that, or are they just doing what they do best (crying and complaining)?
2007-03-06 17:43:21 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
-----
and the "use of the word" was the whole point!!!!! What "consequences"? Her point was you can't use a word like that without having to appear to be politically correct by doing something such as check yourself into rehab.
2007-03-06 17:50:54 · update #1
I totally understand her excuses. Not complicated. So while she didn't call him that,
SHE DID USE THE WORD....
and she needs to deal with the consequences...
2007-03-06 17:46:27 · answer #1 · answered by Rick 4 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Tea party businesses that filed a section 501c(4) request were targeted. And truly frankly, rightly so. If the employer has its request denied, it would not advise they could pay tax. they are nonetheless no longer for income, and secure lower than Federal Elections regulation. besides the undeniable fact that it does advise they can't hide their donors record. i'm particular you're conscious that any political team or committee formed by technique of or for a candidate has to exhibit donors who supply over a particular volume. 501(c)(4) helps businesses to talk and placed out fabric related to any issue, yet "501(c)(4) businesses are literally not accepted direct or oblique participation or intervention in political campaigns on behalf of or in competition to any candidate for public place of work." It became a mistake to study in detail each request with the words "Tea party" in it, yet there's a justifiable concern.
2016-12-05 08:48:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's rather like asking someone to look at the handwriting on the wall while being blinded by a light. They can't.
Interesting reaction from the media.
Interesting choice by her.
2007-03-06 18:22:11 · answer #3 · answered by Wonka 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No..We just dont want to waste our time on any thing a neo.con says or does because nothing you (or Ann Coulters or any other neo/con) say or do is worth spending any time on. Go talk with your buddies in the white house bush and cheney,,I can see you got a lot in common , and know you would enjoy yourselves. We got better and important (way) things to do.
2007-03-06 18:02:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
JUST AS SIMPLE MINDED AS THOSE WHO COULD NOT UNDERSTAND KERRYS ANALOGY...ITS KIND OF A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD AINT IT ? TO PICK APART WHAT SOMEONE SAYS WHEN IT DOES NOT FLOW WITH YOUIR BELIEFS YET WHEN SOMEONE SAYS SOMETHING WAY OFF BASE ON YOUR DEMENTED SIDE OF THE FENCE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN THE PASS ....COULTER IS A HIRED GUN FOR THE CONS WHOS ONLY JOB IS TO SPEAK OUTLANDISH UNTRUTHS GENERATED AND OKAYED BUY THE RNC...
2007-03-06 18:28:02 · answer #5 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The thing is, if she hadn't mentioned Edwards' name, no one would have thought anything other than she was mocking the media.
2007-03-06 17:52:59 · answer #6 · answered by DOOM 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Frankly, I THANK GOD for Ann Coulter. She's the one conservative who is honest enough to say what most of the other Republicans and neocons feel (not think, just feel) but are too scared to say publicly.
She proves - without any need for comments from "liberals" - just how racist, sexist, classist and intolerant the Republican party really is.
So keep up the work Ann! I'd be the last person to try to shut you up.
Well, unless I was a THINKING conservative. Then I'd just be embarrassed.
2007-03-06 18:01:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
That's why I never listen to dumbass Coulter. She dwells on mindless crap - she needs to get out in the real world for a change and talk about something that real people are concerned about.
2007-03-06 17:58:34 · answer #8 · answered by Gemini 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She is just being a child and resorting to name calling.
It has nothing to do with liberal or conservative, democrat or republican. It is childish and uncalled for.
It is amazing what people involved in politics resort to.
Nothing but grown up babies.
Bill O'Reilly does not result to Slander.
That much I will give him.
2007-03-06 18:11:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Ann Colter is a butt brain and has no business in Journalism. People want to hear 'facts' not sensationalism.
2007-03-06 17:51:06 · answer #10 · answered by chole_24 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
uh... it was pretty clear that she was saying "that's all I have to call him, so if I can't call him that, I can't talk about him"...
duh... it's basically calling him that, but not "technically" calling him that... just like Clinton said "oral sex isn't technically sex"...
you sound just like the Dems that said "Kerry was just making a joke!"...
basically, you can try and sugar coat it all you want... but too many Repubicans have come forward and said..."uh that was wrong"...
the thing is... we get it all too well...
2007-03-06 18:43:42 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋