English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-06 17:31:17 · 5 answers · asked by Leela 4 in Politics & Government Elections

5 answers

I'm going to have to disagree with you "Anthony", you can check out his website at www.richardsonforpresident.com or read the article below so that you can see that he has done a lot throughout his career, but since he is a governor of a poor state no one has even noticed.

March 4, 2007

Neither Clinton, nor Obama
Rochester Post-Bulletin

- David Brooks (New York Times)

So there I was, sitting in my office, quietly contemplating suicide. I was watching a cattle call of Democratic presidential candidates on C-Span. In their five-minute speeches, they were laying it on thick with poll-tested, consultant-driven cliches of the Our Children Are Our Future variety. The thought of having to spend the next two years listening to this drivel.

Then Bill Richardson walked onstage. He was dressed differently—in slacks and a sports jacket. He told jokes that didn't seem repeated for the 5,000th time. He seemed recognizably human. He gave the best presentation.

Is it possible to imagine him as a leading candidate for the nomination?

It's easy to picture him rising to the top. He is the most experienced person running for president. He served in Congress for 14 years. He was the energy secretary (energy's kind of vital).

He's a successful two-term governor who was re-elected with 69 percent of the vote in New Mexico, a red state. Moreover, he's a governor with foreign policy experience. He was U.N. ambassador. He worked in the State Department. He's made a second career of negotiating on special assignments with dictators like Saddam, Castro and Kim Jong Il. He negotiated a truce in Sudan.

Most of all, he's not a senator. Since 1961, 40 sitting senators have run for president and their record is 0-40. A senator may win this year, but you'd be foolish to assume it.

When it comes to policy positions, he's perfectly positioned—not by accident—to carry liberals and independents. As governor, he's covered the normal Democratic bases: He raised teacher pay, he expanded children's health insurance, he began programs to stall global warming, he built a light rail line.

But he also cut New Mexico's top income tax rate from 8.2 percent to 4.9 percent. He handed out tax credits to stimulate economic growth. (He's the only Democrat completely invulnerable on the tax cut issue.) He supports free trade, with reservations. And he not only balanced the budget—he also ran a surplus.

On cultural issues, Richardson has the distinct advantage of not setting off any culture war vibes. He was in college in the late 1960s, but he was listening to the Beach Boys, not Janis Joplin. He was playing baseball in the Cape Cod League, not going to Woodstock. He idolized Hubert Humphrey, not Eugene McCarthy.

Richardson is actually something of a throwback pol—a Richard Daley or Fiorello La Guardia who doesn't treat politics as a moral crusade. That might appeal this year.

On the nuts and bolts of the campaign, he has some advantages as well. He won't have the $150 million war chests that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama will have. On the other hand, he won't have the gigantic apparatuses that fundraising on that scale requires. While those campaigns may be bloated, over-managed and remote, Richardson has the potential to be small and nimble.

Furthermore, he could generate waves of free media the way that John McCain did in 2000. He's a reporter's favorite—candid, accessible and fun to be around. "I'm a real person, not canned. I don't have a whole bunch of advisers. I'm a little overweight, though I'm trying to dress better," he told me last week. So far, rumors of personal peccadilloes are unfounded.

Finally, there is the matter of his personal style. This is his biggest drawback. He's baggy-faced, sloppy (we like our leaders well groomed), shamelessly ambitious and inelegant. On the other hand, once a century or so the Democratic Party actually nominates somebody the average person would like to have a beer with. Bill Richardson is that kind of guy.

He is garrulous, amusing, touchy-feely (to a fault), a little rough-edged and comfortably mass-market. He's Budweiser, not microbrew. It doesn't hurt that he's Hispanic and Western.

In short, when you try to think forward to next winter, you see that this campaign will at some point leave the "American Idol"/"Celebrity Deathmatch" phase. The Clinton-Obama psychodrama may cease to fascinate while the sheer intensity of coverage will create a topsy-turvy series of revolutions.

I wouldn't bet a paycheck on Richardson. But I wouldn't count him out. At the moment, he's the candidate most likely to rise.

2007-03-07 02:58:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I like that Bill Richardson is an underdog trying to secure his party's nomination despite clear odds against him. I don't like that he hasn't done much to get a lot of name recognition and to get himself out to the American people to contend with top runners like Clinton and Obama on major issues. The man needs to make news.

2007-03-07 01:36:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anthony M 4 · 1 0

I don't like him because he's too liberal and he isn't concerned about border security even though he is in a state with a major problem!

2007-03-07 03:07:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 1 1

I like that he's from NM.

2007-03-07 01:34:02 · answer #4 · answered by SnoAngel 2 · 0 1

nothing

2007-03-07 01:33:49 · answer #5 · answered by q6656303 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers