English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

also, does anyone know these questions
1. In what ways was Wilson’s foreign policy an extension of the idealistic progressivism he pursued in domestic policy?

2.What were the essential qualities of Wilson’s presidential leadership in 1913-1914?

3. Why did Wilson’s foreign policy fail to prevent further American interventions in Latin America?

4 How did Wilson’s basic principles of progressivism differ from Taft’s or Roosevelt’s?

2007-03-06 14:58:53 · 2 answers · asked by nice too meet you. 4 in Arts & Humanities History

2 answers

Well you hooked me in with the first question so that is the one I'll answer:

1. Wilson's foreign policy with Latin America was interrupted with two things. The invasions of Pancho Villa and the outbreak of WW I.
2. Wilson had just begun to support the new leader of Mexico (much to the displeasure of native Mexicans who didn't care for Huerta) and that led to Pancho Villa leading his murderous attacks throughout the Southwest.
3. Just as that was starting to heat up, Wilson sent "Blackjack" Jack Pershing down to the Southwest to get Villa under contro just as World War I got started and Wilson was forced to abandon any further attention to Mexico (until the Zimmerman Note) gets his full attention.l

2007-03-10 13:09:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ultimately! persons are beginning up their eyes to verify the actuality and the information displayed here communicate for themselves. After that great answer from gypsy_cat 345, i don't have lots to declare different than that persons like Vanessa could desire to inspect the bigger image and make her very own exams, somewhat than believing in what the media choose people to have faith. additionally, i don't think of people could desire to balme the Islamic faith for the strikes of ignorant so-stated as Muslims who declare they're performing on its behalf. secondly, i don't think of Israel is largely a small united states of america that needs to be left on my own. If this replaced into the case it does not have waged an entire-blown conflict on lebanon, killing hundreds of persons with a view to regain 2 of their squaddies who have been captured by potential of Hezbollah. shouldn't they think of roughly liberating the countless numbers of lebanese prisoners at present in Israel! Thirdly, Muslims don't have something against Jews. the project is with the Zionists and Israelis. BTW, i'm not Lebanese. i'm in simple terms asserting what i beleive is the actuality

2016-10-17 11:09:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers