How do you rate President Bush from 1-10 with the war?

Question

From 1-10 (1 is the lowest and 10 is the highest), how do you rate President George W. Bush?
I'd rate him a 5 since he is doing a so-so job.

I only gave him so-so since he is also is thinking about the home land, and plus, I agree with all of you, he is a failure.

5 for thinking about America and -10 for thinking about the troops.

That is a negative 10 for those who can't tell what I had above.

Answer 1

below 0 in iraq; 3 in afghanistan.

apt

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

perhaps it truly is because he's conscious how Custer felt. Custer likely knew that he became being despatched to his death that day. you've a President that has tried to be honorable in this conflict and has tried to do what he concept became suitable alongside with Congress' help in sending the troops and an finished u . s . calls him names because the conflict became no longer gained in one day. The democratic Congress agreed to Iraq yet even as the going were given difficult they kicked the President from head to toe. the money hungry highway on his again for the oil and the jobs. He fought the Republicans and he fought the Democrats and each and each of the President wanted to do became to guard the american human beings and save the struggling with off of yank shorelines. He went in attempting to fix some Christian values and the devil stomped him. no longer a normal wrestle once you are able to wrestle your human being human beings, wrestle the competition and wrestle the conflict also. He bargains with those who imagine there is no longer something incorrect in mendacity. Arafat became a best party of the guy stated as terrorist. He smiled or maybe as he became smiling he lied and in no way meant to uphold the treaty that he signed. It became a shaggy dog tale to him. Hezbollah thinks they gained the conflict hostile to Israel. The UN screamed too a lot stress Israel. i could favor to ask the UN how a lot is only too a lot stress in conflict? Israel could have taken out the completed u . s . of Lebanon yet they did not. an identical applies to united statesa.. Afghanistan and Iraq may be completely annihilated yet we do not favor to damage the threat free with the to blame. How is this conflict gained? The President advantages more suitable positive than what he's getting from his human beings. I honor the place of work and that i honor the guy. I wish he could have taken down abortion and he hasn't. Partial beginning abortion became stopped for awhile. conflict adjustments issues so he in no way had a threat. Eisenhower could have killed so a lot more suitable civilians. Truman could have massacred thousands of thousands. conflict is hell. How do you position hell on a scale?

Answer 4

1 or -1

Answer 5

1 and that's only because it's the lowest rating you offered!
*Not armouring our troops nor caring for them after they are home-despite the huge amounts of money spent on this war!
*Propogandists in direct contact with the Administration hiding behind those troops he's not caring for nor armouring any time he's criticized.
*Al Queda, you know the non-iraqis who attacked us, still has not been disabled!
*Ahu Grahib, Gitmo, Taliban resurging in Afghanistan, and demogougery exploiting 9 11 to grab more power for the executive branch while doing nothing real to stop terrorism!

A FIVE?!? A FIVE??? He doesn't deserve a one!

Answer 6

he started with a 10,
but I have to deduct 5 points for not telling the truth,
and 5 points for not knowing what he's doing.
you will never win a war when you have a commander without a backbone.
so it is a 0

Answer 7

Oh, man. So-so? Well, that's your opinion, but in my opinion, he blew it. First he lied to get the money and support to invade, and then he invaded without an exit strategy.

The two biggest no-no's in running a war. And then he let things spin out of control, and now we will never "win" Iraq back from the militants, no matter how many Americans he sacrifices over there.

I give him a negative seven.

Answer 8

I would have said negative 10 but since the scale is 1-10 then surprise surprise - a 1. He has failed miserably. He is such a womble.

Answer 9

You people have NO IDEA what war is like do you?

4,000 dead in 4 years is NOTHING. Those are incredibly LOW numbers. To only lose that few is quite an achievement. Back when politicians ran wars instead of warriors (Vietnam and Korea) we lost that many in a month. Do some research.

IDIOTS!

Bush is doing what can be done in uncharted territory. I'll give him a 9 ( he lost a point for not carpet bombing Iran and Syria when he should have).

By the way, the troopps aren't getting the weapons and armor they need because liberals in the congress and senate are blocking funding. If you want to blame someone for the dead, blame them!

Answer 10

I think this situation that we are in, is to complex to rate on a scale of 1- 10, I personally dont believe it is bush's fault, He wasnt inadequate for the position in the first place nor was he properly educated, he showed up to his yale interview with a C report card and drunk, and still got in. that position was handed to him. He was corrupt the minute he was born because of his family , i believe its his families fault, cheyney's, The republicans and lets face it the american people for voting for him (well technically al gore actually won the race but thats an answer to a different question!) Our government is now no better than the english from which we tried to escape. as George Orwell said himself : Power corrupts, Absolute power corrupts Absolutely (maybe it was him, and it was something like that, i dunno im a redneck at heart so politics never came natural to me)
but what do i know im only 14 =)