YES
2007-03-11 22:48:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Clinton 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No the writers made that way and Vince of course it is a show after all
2007-03-06 23:51:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by pattibcacl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
orton did it to taker at armageddon and undertaker still kicked out, so randy still might not have won.
But he deserves to
2007-03-06 22:40:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by beijingrocks! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no taker can kick out of anything even the batista bomb
2007-03-13 13:24:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by kelly m 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
won at mania 22 he would have been champ!
2007-03-12 19:58:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by chads the wwe 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
nah, he still has to beat undertaker w/o cheating his way out of it! untertaker will always will be the best
2007-03-06 22:37:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by shabooya33 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
y does it matter its the past it didnt happen and he still would of lost ya its fake
2007-03-06 22:38:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Touchdown 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes there is a high chance he would have beat him
2007-03-06 22:42:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by WILD 4 RKO 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. i don't feel that they would have thought randy orton worthy enough to break undertaker's undefeated streak.
2007-03-06 22:45:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Take me or leave me! 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
duh,he could have ended hiz winnin streak.
2007-03-11 14:35:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by kevin hopson 2
·
0⤊
0⤋