English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

Hillary wouldn't be any different from the Bill Clinton administration, didn't you know she was the one making the decisions then. :>)

2007-03-06 13:05:06 · answer #1 · answered by Carlene W 5 · 2 0

I voted for Bill Clinton two times and, were it not for the constitutional amendment that prevents him running for a third term, I would happily vote for him again. On the other hand, if Hillary Clinton runs for President I would be glad to vote for her as well. They are both very capable individuals.

Bill and Hillary worked together quite well in the early days of Clinton's administration working up proposals for health care reform, and threw the Republican fat cats into such a panic doing it, that the Republicans brought in Ken Starr and his fellow witch hunters, hoping Starr could get rid of the Clintons for them.

Bill Clinton proved his worth by enduring the Ken Starr witch hunt. How many people, in public or private life, could endure such an investigation as Clinton did, an investigation carried out by a freewheeling, "loose cannon" prosecutor with an unlimited budget, and unburdened by any sort of need to show probable cause? Ken Starr proved Clinton to be squeaky clean. Remember Starr was not able to put a single allegation about the original Whitewater issue in his final report. Neither Bill's sex life nor Hillary's, nor anyone else's, is an issue with respect to governing the country.

In fact, Clinton provided a great national service by keeping the Republican-dominated congress mesmerized by their witch hunting, and therefore out of greater mischief. The Republicans might well have been actively passing legislation over Clinton's veto if they had kept their minds on their proper business, and what a mess that would have made!

But perhaps Barack Obama, or some other good candidate, will run instead. Choosing between these highly qualified candidates is a very nice problem to have.

2007-03-14 00:04:45 · answer #2 · answered by GadFlyOnTheWall 1 · 1 0

President Bill Clinton's administration will go down in history as one of the finest ever. Hillary is just as driven as Bill and will work harder. Huge challenges may be handed down to her so it will be a hard start. She will face the problems head on.

2007-03-06 21:30:34 · answer #3 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0 2

I think there is a big difference that was just brought up to me the other day. Hillary is a woman. In several middle eastern countries men don't give a crap about women and think they are superior. Just think how those people would view our country. It's a woman who they think nothing of running our country! Think about that!

2007-03-06 21:09:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hillary has proved she has no back bone already. Any wife that her husband in the news media for what he did and says she just let it go, just to stay in the white house, is weak. Now she says she changed? What has she done in office for New York? Only campaign for newer office. She will not even leave him now, he makes millions each year now. More than is 400k in office.

2007-03-12 14:08:42 · answer #5 · answered by allen w 7 · 1 0

1) Farther left.
2) More vicious.
3) More interns under the desk.

2007-03-06 22:54:24 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2 0

She's female. THAT is the only difference.

Some year a Mrs. President would be fine. One with character and integrity.

2007-03-06 21:12:33 · answer #7 · answered by Proud Nana 3 · 1 0

I would take a guess that there would be less playtime with cigars, and more time devoted to politics.

2007-03-06 21:12:13 · answer #8 · answered by bane10x 2 · 2 1

hiliary is a witch bill was a golem

2007-03-06 21:53:33 · answer #9 · answered by ? 2 · 1 0

I can tell you one similarity. They'll both be caught having sex with a woman.

2007-03-06 21:39:48 · answer #10 · answered by Craig S 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers