English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-06 13:00:04 · 4 answers · asked by sadi carnot 1 in Social Science Economics

4 answers

A nice notion, but unfortunately its implementation would inevitably lead to chaos. There will always be those unsatisfied with enough - and the more globally integrated we become the less time it would take for the bad guys to identify and exploit opportunities to profit from a system of communal "ownership."

2007-03-07 10:09:14 · answer #1 · answered by a c 2 · 0 0

John Lennon. Would be nice in a way. It's been a long time since I've had no possessions. I really don't care much about ownership of "stuff" I like tools to do great works though.

Thanks for the thought refresher.
Jen

2007-03-06 22:12:20 · answer #2 · answered by Jen 5 · 0 0

Why stop at imagining? If you like that idiotic song, then you are free to give all your crap away and live in the street. What's stopping you?

2007-03-06 23:37:10 · answer #3 · answered by KevinStud99 6 · 1 1

Nothing to kill or die for a brotherhood of man.

2007-03-06 21:03:56 · answer #4 · answered by Deirdre O 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers