No it wasn't. I thought the story was so predictable at times.
2007-03-06 12:27:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rommie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because it is rated 13 and up and grudge is not a scary movie and im a scary movie fan i dont get scared easy let me tell u some better movies that a kinda scary: venom, saw 2 and 3 , the decent texas chain saw massacre and texas chainsaw massacre the begining , see no evil, the hills have eyes and the hills have eyes 2 and my favorite freddy versus jason
2007-03-06 20:35:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually I thought the movie was boring, derivative, and highly unoriginal.
I liked the first one, though.
FP
2007-03-06 20:27:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by F. Perdurabo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, because they only made a 2nd one to copy "The Ring" like they did in the first movie, but heck, the cover for both movies scare me!
2007-03-10 14:39:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
eh not really
in my opinion, they ruined the "scary and unknown" effect by showing her face too much.
it was much scarier in the 1st one because she was somewhat hidden and it made it more scary. for me at least.
2007-03-06 20:33:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by ohmercymercyme! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i didnt think it was at all. i could determine the plot before the story even started. those movies stink
2007-03-06 20:27:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i thought they both were going to be too scary and i thought they were both HiLaRiOuS!! i was laughing like crazy(kind of cheesy,huh??)
2007-03-06 20:35:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by meme k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, it was not scary. kinda laim i thought
2007-03-06 20:30:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by kelly 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know, I've never seen it.
2007-03-06 20:27:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tigger 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.
2007-03-06 20:27:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by jquick13 4
·
0⤊
0⤋