English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

yeah guilty.

2007-03-06 11:53:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

NO WAY!!! Duane, tim and leland did something that nobody else had the guts to do. They captured a man who raped over 80 women. Andrew luster needed to be put behind bars for a very long time, and Dog did it. Dog has changed his life and become a better person. He's helping the streest of Hawaii and Colorado become a safer place for our children. If you had a daughter that was raped, by this sick guy wouldnt you be thankful for dog and his courage? I give props and support to the chapman family, and I think its sad that our own U.S. senate wont put their foot down and stand up for these men. GO DOG.

2007-03-07 01:58:39 · answer #2 · answered by Heather Michelle 2 · 2 0

He does appear to be guilty of violating the law he is charged with. Of course, you may argue that he did a greater good and he's seem to be arguing the same thing. That may help his court case, but it depends on how the courts in Mexico operate. In the US, that would probably help him get off.

2007-03-06 19:57:29 · answer #3 · answered by David S 5 · 1 1

he is technically guilty, but an american citizen should not be taken to a foreign country for a misdemeanor. the man he apprehended was a monster. i believe the family who has millions is behind this travesty.

2007-03-06 20:27:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

He is so not guilty! He didn't deserve so many years on jail (practically until his death, and a couple of years more) for doing his job !! It was just his JOB! It's like if you get arrested for your job..it's not fair. He actually captured a serial raptist...HELLO!?!?! That was a good!!

2007-03-06 19:57:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He's not guilty for taking a rapist off the streets he did nothing wrong

2007-03-06 19:56:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Guilty for apprehending a ruthless serial rapist?
Nope.

2007-03-06 19:54:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

no i dont think he is guity for what bring people taht have broke the law to justice he is a hero to me and he is living prove that people can change their life and he has hard life after lose his daugter to a car accident he still was able to go on and do his job he is a hero to me

2007-03-06 19:56:07 · answer #8 · answered by crystal w 3 · 3 0

Yeah, he's guilty but who cares? He's only after the really bad guys. I think he's doing society a great big favor! YAY DOG!

2007-03-06 19:55:01 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 1 4

no, i think he is innocent. he has turned his life around from the way it was and has done a lot of good. not too many ex-cons do that. they need to give him a break. good luck.

2007-03-06 19:55:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Absolutely. He went to a country where he has absolutely no legal right to capture criminals, and detained someone. The laws of the USA do not apply in mexico, and vice versa. The americans wouldn't like it if a Mexican law enforcement officer came to the US and detained someone.

2007-03-06 19:56:02 · answer #11 · answered by Deasel98 5 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers