English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am writing a short paper on whether Hilary should be focusing more on men's votes instead of focusing on women's votes. I have read many articles that focus on her campaigning to women's organizations and trying to attract female voters - but should it be the other way around. I know statistics show that female voters take the majority in voting in the 4-year elections, but I would have assumed that Hilary had the majority of women's votes, and that she'd have to work on the men and gaining their favor.

P.S. Let's try to keep it politically correct. It's about voting practices, not who hates which politician and making ignorant or nasty comments public.
Thanks!

2007-03-06 11:27:05 · 3 answers · asked by Euralalya 5 in Politics & Government Government

3 answers

Since the majority of men vote for republican candidates in presidential elections more often than not, there is no real point in Hillary Clinton courting the male vote.

2007-03-06 11:32:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is my opinion that she should not run, because our nation does not want another Clinton and the Republicans would win.

Edited: Since she is running, appealing to women voters would probably be her best chance of winning.

2007-03-06 11:36:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think that in a small way. The fact that she tries to look more masculine. (little make-up and wearing pantsuits) She is trying to appeal to the male vote. Males most generally vote republican though. So it may be in vain.

2007-03-06 11:36:09 · answer #3 · answered by Johnny Conservative 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers