Both were a hoax.
And both were lynchings.
Democrats are experienced at lynchings.
2007-03-06 10:44:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by wolf 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
"Outing" a CIA agent? HA!! What a joke! First, she was an analyst not an agent and not protected by the law. Second, she had discussed her CIA connections in public interviews in the past and was publicly listed as a CIA employee. Third, no law was broken. Fourth, a senate committee had concluded that both her and her husband had lied about their trip for her husband's "investigation" of the uranium purchases. Finally, the investigator who charged Libby had been informed by another journalist that he was the source of the "CIA" outing leak.
There never was a reason to have carried on the investigation. Maybe Libby had similar memory lapses as Hillary did about her hugh speculation profits and billing records!
2007-03-06 18:55:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by RAG 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I had my way they would both be behind bars for a very long time. But unfortunately money get privileges the rest of us don't have.
2007-03-06 18:53:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many of clinton's friends went to jail over whitewater?
Remember Susan Mcdougall?
2007-03-06 18:41:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by infobrokernate 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well the difference is National Security vs. making money, but you can make your own assumptions. I believe the jury has made theirs as will history.
2007-03-06 18:45:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by fitzovich 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Big difference..Mary Stewart didn't place national security in danger, didn't conspire with her boss and the President to lie and deceive the American people.
Libby was found guilty of obstruction of justice and perjury.....Cheney is next.
2007-03-06 18:42:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
The difference is he is better looking.
2007-03-06 18:42:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Phartzalot 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
its just something for them to say hey look we are fighting evil
2007-03-06 18:42:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋