English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-06 10:36:20 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

4 answers

FOX News

2007-03-06 14:33:24 · answer #1 · answered by karen w 3 · 1 0

MSNBC comes closest to telling the truth with out resorting to sensationalism virtually as usually as CNN (see Nancy Grace's coverage of the Duke case) although often times they of route lean to the left of their coverage. of route, Fox information isn't even information, this is organic propaganda, a prepared puppet of Christian Conservative perspectives designed to mock, degrade and push aside all of us who doesn't believe them. the real problem with all television information at present is that there is now no longer any objectivity. evaluations are infused in coverage and would misinform visitors into questioning what's stated is truth even as this isn't any longer. I word now that a great number of those stations have journalists like Couric on CBS and Hannity on Fox who say such issues as "some people say.." even as interviewing visitors. What the hell style of 0.5-baked BS is that??? who're those people? How do i understand the interviewer is not merely making that up? regrettably, the 1996 Telecommunications Act destroyed what become left of objectivity and responsibility in modern day information media. finally, this can do extra damage to our u . s . than any of the corrupt acts perpetrated via Dubya or Bubba.

2016-11-28 02:52:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

CNN

2007-03-06 10:44:03 · answer #3 · answered by Grand pa 7 · 0 0

CNN!!!

2007-03-06 11:17:09 · answer #4 · answered by KELLY S 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers