were the delegates to the constitutional convention representative of the american public?

Answer 1

As with all times (including ours) these were the people who were activists. More over, they were a highly educated group of activists who had studied governments of many types and truly understood what they were doing. Most had been elected to office by the voters in a number of areas. They did represent the people. To state that they didn’t represent the poorer masses is not meaningful.

Many had come from families that had little and they had worked themselves up to where they were respected by others within society. Nor were they all land owning aristocrats. For example, none could have come from a more poor and disadvantaged background than Alexander Hamilton who became one of the most influential members of the convention.

Answer 2

there have been both Federalist and Anti-Federalist delegates, although the Federalist skill turned right into slightly more suitable. the completed tale is quite complicated, and certain - they did overstep their skill, knew they were doing that, and were given away with it because what they arise with become something far previous what all of us anticipated. the controversy took months contained in the sweltering warmth - it become no longer thrilling. i latterly study MIRACLE IN PHILADELPHIA about the convention - a fantastic study, absolutely properly absolutely worth the time.

Answer 3

No. They were wealthy, land owning aristocrats, unrepresentative of the poorer masses.