I know they get good pops, but their work ethics are horrible compared to some of the other talents. The moves are the freakin
same each week. I give Cena a little credit cause he can give great interviews. But Batista is just a dud.
2007-03-06 08:52:43 · 17 answers · asked by DMann1 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I don't have to think long and hard about this the answer simply is no. John Cena and Batista have to be the worst heavy weight champions of all time.
2007-03-06 08:56:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes there has been, when Ultimate Warrior held the IC and World at the same time. THAT was the worst two champions of all time.
Cena has great work ethic, he's a work horse actually, he just doesn't' have the skill to back it up. Batista's just lost all intensity. I was high on Dave before he got injured, but when he came back...it was like a neutered dog coming back from the vet, he just didn't seem to have much to live for.
2007-03-06 09:11:39 · answer #2 · answered by Candle 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Edge was a bad champion why, because he can actually wrestle and cut good promos? Hogan was never as bad as Batista or Cena, either. Yokozuna atleast had a good gimmick that DIDN'T get old (see: John Cena's "marine" gimmick). As far back as I can remember in WCW, there was never a champion that couldn't wrestle. I liked Hogan as "Hollywood Hogan". Flair and Sting were great champions. The only one that comes to mind is Goldberg, but he's on the same level as Batista and Cena. I can't stand Cena on the mic. He tries to be funny, but only little kids find his stuff funny.
2007-03-06 09:09:57 · answer #3 · answered by kid_of_seph 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Batista is pretty bad. I also think Big Show's first reign was awful, as well. He was feuding in the mid card with the Big Boss Man. But hands down the worst champ was David Arquette.
2007-03-06 08:58:42 · answer #4 · answered by beancroc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amen Brotha
2007-03-06 09:01:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like how some of you are only thinking about the newer "bad champs" it really shows how many children are on this site. "King Booker is the worst of all time" PLEASE He was a good heel. Yokozuna was horrible. Never talked (English), No charisma, never did any good movesets... that is a bad champ to me. I'm allowed to talk smack, cause I am 23 and actually was alive to see those matches live.
2007-03-06 09:02:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-03-06 09:04:15 · answer #7 · answered by Yo 100$ (YUWL) (X-way ECW) 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't think of two worse champions, and I've been watching for years. Whenever I see them, I have to change the channel.
2007-03-06 11:03:39 · answer #8 · answered by Barry 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i totally agree with u...i lve them both...but they need some more moves....they need to like ask some other wwe superstars back there in the locker room for some new moves if they relly want to keep the title for a long time
2007-03-06 09:03:29 · answer #9 · answered by AltCtrlEssie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hrm. Come to think of it, no =D
it seems Vince has an eye for "real talent"
...wait. He just pulls these superstars out of his as.s.
2007-03-06 09:02:23 · answer #10 · answered by tr0y 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋