Or, will he himself be guilty of prosecutorial malfeasance, and chicken out?
2007-03-06 08:42:19 · 5 answers · asked by Aught 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Neither. Libby won't squeal, and Bush will pardon him when he leaves office.
2007-03-06 08:44:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He should prosecute himself, for not stopping the investigation as soon as he discovered that Plame WAS NOT AN UNDERCOVER CIA AGENT. NO law was broken by giving her identity out, and it was a valid point to make that she had a bias against the Administration and wanted to trump up unfounded claims about President Bush's reasons for taking out Saddam Hussein.
2007-03-06 08:47:49 · answer #2 · answered by boonietech 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. Cheney, Armitage and Rove have already been investigated and not found guilty of any wrongdoing.
2007-03-06 08:45:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
to anser your queshun, no . he sed he would not prosacute cheney or rove and armatuge didnut violate the law.
2007-03-06 08:50:39 · answer #4 · answered by Timothy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Fitgerald has already stated this investigation is closed. try reading a newspaper once in a while.
2007-03-06 08:53:16 · answer #5 · answered by webbrew 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋