English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Evolutionists and Biologists.?
Abiogenesis and Evolution?

First law of Thermodynamics: If matter can never be created or destroyed then how did we get here?

And for the evolutionists:

What about?

Cosmic Evolution: Time, Space and Matter have to come into existance. You can't be any place and be out of time. You can have anyone of these without the other two.

Chemical Evolution:Where did we get other elements? Fusion can't be the answer because you can't get past iron with fusion

Stellar Evolution: Stars? We have never seen them form? So how did they? No one has ever proven the formation of one star?

Orgainc Evolution: Life getting started, this would have to result from the non-living

Macro Evolution: No one has ever seen a dog make a nondog. Sure you get variations but it is still a dog.

Micro Evolution: This is the only one that is scientific and it only shows variations within the kinds.

First five are purely religous:

Additional Details

14 minutes ago
And some more about the Big Bang:

So from a state of nothingness everything exploded into nothing?

So we all came from a dot and the dot came from nothing? That's science?

Who made matter? Just call evolution a religion like Christianity? So why do I have to pay for your religion to be taught in the schools?

The Conservation of Angular Momentum:

Should spin in same direction:

How come two planets spin backwards 8 of 91 moons are backwards? Problem for the Big Bang? I think so....

Second Law of Thermodynamics:

Order to Chaos.

Energy can't help because there would have been nothing to channel it. The japanese came Pearl Harbor some energy but did it help them? No.

Ask questions and I'll keep going.

2007-03-06 08:28:35 · 5 answers · asked by Theoretically Speaking 3 in Science & Mathematics Biology

yes, becsuse in micro evolution it makes the same species...... we never witness it making a new one nor do we have evidence

2007-03-06 08:54:25 · update #1

5 answers

Self justified ignorance of the worst kind.

Evolution does not counteract the second law of thermodynamics any more than you eating something ordered - like an apple - which becomes disordered, then raises your energy level and become something ordered again like some fat or muscle tissue. So, does eating also go against the second law?
Energy is constantly hitting the Earth in the form of sunlight, it is gathered by plants and slowly lost through the food chain. Evolution is encompassed within this food chain. It counteracts the second law as much as changing a pile of bricks into a wall.

As for where time, space and matter came into existence, I suggest you talk to a quantum physicist, they may have some answers. But I suspect you will not be able to understand them, especially with your fingers stuck firmly in your ears. To a quantum physicist, nothingness is just an equal amount of positive and negative energy/matter. The Big Bang is science, but not as you know it.

You can indeed get past iron with fusion, given enough energy, like that found when stars explode. We recently had two novae in the Scorpius constellation. There would have been large amounts of various elements produced in both these explosions.

Creationism should be taught in schools only if Evolution is also preached from the pulpit.

2007-03-06 09:40:54 · answer #1 · answered by Terracinese 3 · 0 1

> If matter can never be created or destroyed then how did we get here?
We're a reorganization of existing matter. My mother ate food. As I gestated, I incorporated those molecules into myself. After I was born, I ate food.

> Where did we get other elements? Fusion can't be the answer because you can't get past iron with fusion
Wrong. Iron is the stopping point where fusion yields energy. Heavier elements can be formed, but energy is consumed.

> Stars? We have never seen them form? So how did they? No one has ever proven the formation of one star?
Are you sure about that?

> No one has ever seen a dog make a nondog.
We've seen a wolf make a non-wolf. If anyone wants to call a mini-dachshund "wolf" my response is: get glasses.

> Micro Evolution
Is there any mechanism to prevent micro-evolution, over a very long period of time, from becoming macroevolution?

2007-03-06 08:49:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

It sounds like you have been getting your education from creationist websites rather than from the sciences of physics, chemistry, biochemistry, genetics and biology.

some quick replies
Matter was formed during the first fractional second of the big bang when the universe cooled enough to allow for the seperation of mass and energy.

Higher elements are formed with the energy of a supernova explosion.

To have microevolution and not macroevolution you would have to have a mechanism that prevented the continuing cumulative effects of nucleobase transcription errors in reproductively isolated populations once they reached sub-specific divergence.

etc., etc., if you want to get a real education, rather than just creationist propaganda, get yourself enrolled in a University and open your mind to learning.

2007-03-06 09:13:21 · answer #3 · answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6 · 1 1

You asked this question on S&R and got a good kicking. I would suggest you don't come here to prove your ignorance.

2007-03-06 08:33:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Interesting, a whole lot of "research" from someone who doesn't read, assimilate, and compare on a coherent level.

Very, very sad.
.

2007-03-06 09:28:02 · answer #5 · answered by Icteridae 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers