No and no.
Should they have been?
Yes and Yes.
2007-03-06 07:54:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bud 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Clinton was never convicted of a crime, and Nixon was pardoned by Gerald Ford first thing. Why would you need a pardon if you weren't convicted right?
2007-03-06 15:51:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by leonard bruce 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Neither was convicted. Nixon was almost impeached for Watergate but he resigned. Clinton never got pinned for his financial and sexual indiscretions.
2007-03-06 15:49:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Actually Nixon was convicted but pardoned by Gerald Ford.
2007-03-06 15:50:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by H.C.Will 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Neither
2007-03-06 15:45:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Neither. But only Clinton was impeached.
2007-03-06 15:46:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Nope, but, boy wre they guilty. Ask some of the folks from Arkansas that knew about the White River properties. or, ask about Vince Foster.
2007-03-06 15:45:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Aristarchus 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Neither was.
2007-03-06 15:44:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋