If you could chose only one, which would you chose?
2007-03-06 06:52:05 · 13 answers · asked by Rabbit 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
To be loved
2007-03-06 06:59:27 · answer #1 · answered by pooped_over 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to love. If I couldn't love then irt would probably be replaced by hate or anger which I would not want to be filled with even if it meant no one loved me. And even if I could have no love and not have it be replaced with hate- to never know the feeling of love for someone else in my opinion would be worse than not having someone ever love you. Hard choice though.
2007-03-06 14:58:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is better by far to Love because that is a fountain that always renews itself. The more Love you give the more you have to give. Also those who give love in great amounts always are loved in return......
2007-03-06 15:45:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most people would say to be loved. Me? I think it's best to love, to be able to give that much to someone is a wonderful feeling.
2007-03-06 14:57:47 · answer #4 · answered by brneyedgirl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is always better to love, when you love without question there seems to be a quiet joy that follows.
2007-03-06 17:10:18 · answer #5 · answered by Odyssey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think to love is better .
Atleast I have the freedom to love the person I want to.
Being loved takes away freedom
2007-03-06 14:56:13 · answer #6 · answered by vinamra j 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you offer love you will get love in return.
2007-03-06 14:57:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's better to love..... in giving you receive. Besides that you're already loved.
2007-03-06 17:36:57 · answer #8 · answered by jbb 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He who loves best is loved back. I choose loving.
2007-03-06 14:59:23 · answer #9 · answered by NakasEvilTwin 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For either one you will choose you will get both , love and you will be loved . to be loved is to love.
2007-03-06 23:56:08 · answer #10 · answered by Rizal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋