2007-03-06 05:43:36 · 5 answers · asked by Truth For Liberty 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I would because he defends the Constitution and is against illegal immigration. If he doesn't get the GOP nomination (which he won't), maybe he should retract on what he said about not running for a third party and probably be on the ticket for both the Constitution and Libertarian parties. He'd be a uniter because he's a card-carrying LP member and is liked in the Constitution party. He could have both parties field a unity ticket. Besides, even though he didn't do well in 1988 doesn't mean he can't do well now.
2007-03-06 08:00:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would! I think Ron Paul is honest and will actually hold the country to constitutional principles without compromise. I don't think he is electable for exactly that reason. He is very principled but unwilling to compromise in the ways that most people foolishly want the government to compromise.
2007-03-06 14:08:03 · answer #2 · answered by halfway 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't even know who he is. So I'd have to say I wouldn't consider it at this point.
addendum: I just looked him up. He's a congressman from Texas. I would consider him if I knew what he stood for. I must admit I did not know who he was until today. However, I probably don't know who half the 435 congressmen are.
2007-03-06 13:51:03 · answer #3 · answered by Faye H 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not me.
2007-03-06 13:48:02 · answer #4 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
..............WHO ?.............
2007-03-06 13:47:21 · answer #5 · answered by ThomasL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋