Of course, the leaking of Valerie Plame was in retaliation for her husband's telling the media there was no proof that Sadam was attempting to obtain "yellow cake" from Africa.
I also think that it "may" lead the way for Congressional investigations on what the reasons were that took us to war in Iraq.
2007-03-06 05:35:34 · 12 answers · asked by Nancy L 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I doubt it.
The extremely flat learning curve of the BushCo administration is easily apparent.
Their mantra seems to be, "If two wrongs don't make a right, try three."
2007-03-06 05:41:51 · answer #1 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you have been asleep for a long time. Libby was on trial for lieing to the FBI. Plame was not a covert agent. Libby was never charged with outing her. Richard Armitage is the source of the leak. To this day the British believe saddam was trying to get yellow cake from Niger. Joe Wilson who was sent to Niger by his wife (Plame) is a proven liar.
2007-03-06 05:42:06 · answer #2 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why they did it on purpose to create the urgency for a false war to profiteer from it. The Bush Administration has made fortunes off of the dying and wounded at American tax payers expense.
2007-03-07 20:40:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The leaks of categorized suggestions to strengthen the status of the closet-socialist maggot is despicable, yet par for the direction for this bunch. and picture Holder investigating fellow cockroaches! this is like letting the mummy and dad of the Colorado shooter prosecute their own son!!
2016-10-17 10:07:25 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They will plan better next time. Scripted as to who will tell what to whom and when. Or they may just send secret police and their victim will never be seen again. Nevada has some very isolated places where people can "disappear".
2007-03-06 05:40:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Libby wasn't the brightest bulb in the pack, why didn't he make a plea bargain and testify against the bigger fish. Now he faces 30yrs
2007-03-06 06:52:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm. Another liberal ignoring the facts who just wants to take pot shots at the Bush administration. If you knew anything about this case, its crap. Just like Martha Stewart. Remember her? Convicted on lying about something they couldn't prove she lied about! Were you this upset after the Clinton administation leaked classified nuclear secrets to the Chinese? You know the Chinese who now have the ability to put multiple nuclear warheads on top of missiles thanks to Billy. You 'member right?
2007-03-06 05:44:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The White House "leaks" whatever it wants. Now they have gone too fat. There are bigger fish - soon to be caught.
2007-03-06 05:42:27 · answer #8 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably but not quit as bold as stealing documents out of the Archieves, and not go to jail!
2007-03-06 05:38:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I think the President will give Cheney the old whip lashing he deserves.
2007-03-06 05:46:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋