Does Steven Hawkins answers the dilemma of Creation in accordance to Heinsenberg's Principle of certainty?

Answer 1

The way the universe came into existence is really not a dilemma there are merely varying theories.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is predicated on the fact that each entity in the universe has a zero time.
Any thing that exists around you exists in the past. Even your own reflection in a mirror is an image that doesn't exist anymore.
It lags your movement so you can never know where it is at any time.
The universe started as a single space-time pulse,a two dimensional singularity of minimum duration.
As the pulses continued two more dimensions were added.
The entity tripled it's essence each time pulse,it expanded radially accelerating for one thirty-billionths of a second it reached the speed of light and the acceleration stopped..
At this time there was a mature universe about the size of a marble with all the ingredients to evolve into the universe that we experience to-day No gravity,elecro-magnetism none of the strong or weak forces An almost perfect quantum entity permeated by quantization errors that would eventually evolve into the universe and us.

Answer 2

AresIV is pretty much right one about everything but I would like to add something. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is what caused everything to be the way that it is today. You see the cosmic microwave background radiation is very isotropic across the entire universe around 2.73 K I believe. This means that the when the big bang explosion was very isotropic in nature. This would be fine if it weren't for the fact that nothing would exist. If the universe were perfectly isotropic then everything would have been spread evenly and matter couldn't have begun to clump together or form areas of high concentration (galaxies) or areas of low concentration (interstellar space). This is where Heisenberg comes in. If we go back to when the universe was very very small we notice that tiny quantum fluctuations made the explosion very bumpy as opposed to smooth. As the universe became bigger these fluctuations are what allowed everything to from the way it did. I hope this helps....and wasn't too long :-)

Answer 3

First off, it's Stephen Hawking.


Secondly, the theory of Creation is not a dilemma it is a dogmatic theory that is the Yin to Evolution's Yang.

Third, Heiseberg's Principle of UNcertainty applies to quantum physics on the atomic scale. It basically states that one may know the location of an electron but not its velocity, and vice versa.

Quantum Physics has never been applied successfully beyond the atomic scale. Many physicists have attempted to create what is called Unified Field Theory which incorporates Classical Physics, Quantum Physics, and other such areas into one unified theory of Physics. One such person was Einstein, though he was never successful.

Stephen Hawking has devoted most of his life and work to astrophysics with his best known research dealing with black holes and theories dealing with the beginning of the Universe. His research has yielded some of the biggest leaps in our understanding of such phenomena since Einstein, however, your question is a moot point as Heisenberg Uncertainty cannot be applied properly to macro-scale physics.

Answer 4

i completely agree with ares. although, hawking did incorporate quantum mechanics into his understanding of blackholes. as far as creation goes who knows, all i know is that it didnt happen like religions say it did!!!!