Would you travel across the Australian outback after watching "Wolf Creek"?

Answer 1

Well you know its not really a singular true story. It's just like Texas Chainsaw Massacre....they piece together the most horrifying things imaginable, some of which people have actually done, and then just embellish to make up the rest.

Check it out for yourself...... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_Creek_(film)

Answer 2

enormous cities (for inland Australia) including broken Hill, Alice Springs and Mt Isa are actually not frequently classed as "outback" yet small distant cities including Birdsville, Oodnadatta and Finke rather are. you do not would desire to go some distance out of the great inland cities to be interior the outback. Remoteness, loss of inhabitants and being removed from the coast are the considerable good factors in spite of the reality that for the duration of Western Australia, the place the desert is going all a thank you to the coast, many of the coastal Pilbara and Kimberley must be classed as outback. Wilkes (A Dictionary of Australian Colloquialisms) defines it as "The areas distant from the settled districts" and costs Henry Lawson in "some established Australian blunders" (1893) "Australian poetical writers perpetually get the coastal atmosphere blended up with that of the 'Out lower back' ... we prefer to Heaven that Australian writers might leave off attempting to make a paradise out of the Out lower back Hell."

Answer 3

that movie sucked so much.
i didnt even finish that shittt

Answer 4

of course.....movie wasn't even scary.....