2007-03-06 03:17:22 · 10 answers · asked by S D 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I fail to see why a child shouldn't be brought. Allowing the child to see the hearing will help explain why mama isn't coming home for a while.
2007-03-06 03:31:28 · answer #1 · answered by Michael E 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really don't think there's any point to hiding a child from what they'll eventually experience in the future. Under ten years old is a different story but 10-year old children are smarter than you think. It might be a good experience for them. I'm not a father, though. I could be wrong.
2007-03-06 03:28:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
only if the child is able to understand whats going on,it might help the child to understand that doing bad things will cost you in the long run.
2007-03-06 03:26:02 · answer #3 · answered by walterferguson2226 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seven is the typical "age of Reason". Look it up.
There comes a point when children must be exposed, or risk being twiddling idiots who cannot handle life. Look at my generation. LOL
2007-03-06 03:32:17 · answer #4 · answered by starryeyed 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not that is very bad. That child mind will replay that over and over.
2007-03-06 03:49:19 · answer #5 · answered by Jamonican 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's obviously to tug at the heartstrings of the judge. I can see where the defense would want that.
2007-03-06 03:22:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if she can't find a baby sitter.
2007-03-06 03:21:03 · answer #7 · answered by Vernon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not unless he really wants to go...
2007-03-06 03:22:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No....what would be the point.
2007-03-06 03:22:06 · answer #9 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think so.
2007-03-06 03:20:37 · answer #10 · answered by Jay 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋