look at how quickly japan gave up in world war 2 after we dropped a couple of nukes why dont we just use the old tried and tested method instead of wasting american lives? and look at japan now one of the richest and most civilised places on earth so it would be good for them 2
2007-03-06 03:12:28 · 7 answers · asked by fiddich59 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
smedrik it hasnt harmed japan has it
2007-03-06 03:17:19 · update #1
the problem is the way that the oil is chambered through the middle east. There are serious geological issues in using nukes in Iraq that could damage the entire region and its supply of oil.
2007-03-06 03:15:57 · answer #1 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The war on terror is not a traditional war. Now with terror 'cells' and groups of people fighting and not having any knowledge of who what and where, we cannot cut off a head so to speak.
The 'terror war' has many heads. Cut off one and a new one will replace it.
When you are fighting what has become known as radical fundamentalists, who will kill many innocent people indiscriminantly, you have to be careful. Drop 'the' bomb in Iraq and you might find 5 dirty bombs go off in North America and Europe.
I think a war that remains relatively conventional (even though I am aware that convention has changed) will do just fine.
I do not want to wake up to see a mushroom cloud over New York, or read about a viral attack in the Toronto Subway system.
Guns and tanks on foreign soil? Works for me.
TFTP
2007-03-06 11:20:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow, just wow.
You are advocating killing possibly millions of innocent people and leaving a lasting nuclear waste land that will continue to poison generations to come.
It didn't hurt them??
The initial bombing killed 250,00 people the majority of which were civilians. In the years following (calculated up until 1990) thousands of deaths in Japan have been attributed to radiation poisoning.
Japans enjoys higher cancer rates then most nations,
Saying that Japan is unaffected is a gross misstatement, almost half a century after the becoming people are still suffering the ill effects of radiation.
*nuclear material can take thousands - millions of years to break down
2007-03-06 11:16:00 · answer #3 · answered by smedrik 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it harmed japan till now many people suffering from radiation. some babies are born handicaped even after 50 years.it affected environment and had green house affect on our planet.another disaster like this will completly destroys our planet.
2007-03-06 11:29:08 · answer #4 · answered by sri 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh come on, we've come a long way since WWII. Don't we have like, neutron bombs that kill people but leave everything untouched?
I know it makes me evil, but one or two of those would make them crap their pants and realize what they are messing with....
2007-03-06 11:20:24 · answer #5 · answered by Brian I 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with yea...I don't why they just fumigated all this rats terrorits...
2007-03-06 11:16:34 · answer #6 · answered by nena_en_austin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
History is also knowledge..... we have to use knowledge everytime..... problem is MIS-CALCULATION.....only
2007-03-06 11:18:58 · answer #7 · answered by saleem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋