Liberals? Is there anything you aren't complaining about??

Answer 1

They are not complaining about Cheney's health problems...

Answer 2

You know, regarding the state of the Union, not much. Until the neo-cons and Karl Rove are out of the picture and we can begin trying to repair our country, those of us who are lucid and not blinded by war-hawk fervor and bullying loudmouthed Fox News talk show hosts will dissent, and the louder the better. Not loud enough, to tell you the truth.

Lemme ask you this...are you rich? No? Well, that extra 120 dollars you saved last year from those generous Republican tax cuts was nice, I'm sure, but not as nice as your employer's half million or so. Well, that's less revenue, but our spending seems to go up...no you can't blame liberals. Nearly every porker in Congress for the last decade has been Republican. And where does this money come from? The freakin' CHINESE!!! Trillions of freaking dollars in US treasury bonds belong to CHINA! They can turn us into a third world country at will! Our currency will be worthless! Well, your family and mine will probably live in poverty forever after that, but I'm sure that your employer will be alright, along with the other very rich people who spent their extra tax money on gold, ensuring their continued wealth.

Answer 3

Yeah i would like to complain about the media & T.V. Preachers telling me i got to fake like i am happy about being fleeced & victimized in this out-ta-control Fascist Capitalistic strangle-hold society of which i got no say or control over! Your vote every 2/4/6/8 years isn't even verifiable, what Democracy in the Fascist Republic of? My country USA the wealthy elite need to be brought to their Knee,s for excluding their fellow several generational American fellow citizens! This is an offical written complaint how do you like it so far? P.S. Your Question seems to complain about Liberals wanting to voice their concerns!

Answer 4

Aren't you the ones that put this country down the tubes and still attack Clinton who has not been President for 6 years!

We did more than complain! I don't think the House or the Senate belong to Republicans anymore. And neither will the president very soon. He will be on his 100,000 acres in South America currently protected by US Military! He doesn't want to get tried as a war criminal!

Did the Republicans get anything passed other than cuts for the poor, Tax cuts for the rich, a 199 Billion dollar cut to the VA Hospitals, the "Patriot Act" and the " Military Commissions Act of 2006"! In fact your president has another cut for VA hospitals and another tax cut for the rich in his current budget! How can you defend that?

Weren't you the ones complaining about liberals and their response to terrorism, attacking Clinton as well, when it is you who are the failures!

Don't say you weren't warned! This was WAY before 9/11

7-30-1996, WASHINGTON -- President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess.

"We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue," Clinton said during a White House news conference.

But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures.

Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Mississippi, doubted that the Senate would rush to action before they recess this weekend. The Senate needs to study all the options, he said, and trying to get it done in the next three days would be tough.

One key GOP senator was more critical, calling a proposed study of chemical markers in explosives "a phony issue."

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, "These are very controversial provisions that the White House wants. Some they're not going to get."

Hatch said the compromise bill would prevent international terrorist organizations from raising money in the United States and provide for the swift deportation of international terrorists.

The Republicans also dropped the additional wire-tap authority the Clinton administration wanted. U.S. Attorney general Janet Reno had asked for "multi-point" tapping of suspected terrorists, who may be using advanced technology to outpace authorities.

Rep. Charles Schumer, D-New York, said technology is giving criminals an advantage. "What the terrorists do is they take one cellular phone, use the number for a few days, throw it out and use a different phone with a different number," he said. "All we are saying is tap the person, not the phone number."

The measure, which the Senate passed overwhelmingly Wednesday evening, is a watered-down version of the White House's proposal. The Clinton administration has been critical of the bill, calling it too weak. AP

Note: The senate was controlled by the republicans in 1996. Trent Lott was the majority leader.


Clarke: Bush didn't see terrorism as 'urgent'
9/11 panel hears from Berger, Tenet
Wednesday, May 19, 2004 Posted: 1:16 AM EDT (0516 GMT) CNN
A day of drama at the 9/11 Commission
Clarke: 'No sense of urgency'
Tenet admits 9/11 intelligence failings
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush's former counterterrorism chief testified Wednesday that the administration did not consider terrorism an urgent priority before the September 11, 2001, attacks, despite his repeated warnings about Osama bin Laden's terror network.
"I believe the Bush administration in the first eight months considered terrorism an important issue, but not an urgent issue," Richard Clarke told a commission investigating the September 11 attacks.

Rice Falsely Claims Bush’s Pre-9/11 Anti-Terror Efforts Were ‘At Least As Aggressive’ As Clinton’s
This morning, in the Fox-owned New York Post, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice reacts angrily to President Clinton’s criticisms of how the Bush administration approached the terrorist threat during their first eight months in office. (The Post headlines the article “Rice Boils Over Bubba“) An excerpt:
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday accused Bill Clinton of making “flatly false” claims that the Bush administration didn’t lift a finger to stop terrorism before the 9/11 attacks.
… “What we did in the eight months was at least as aggressive as what the Clinton administration did in the preceding years,” Rice added.
The 9/11 Commission Report contradicts Rice’s claims. On December 4, 1998, for example, the Clinton administration received a President’s Daily Brief entitled “Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks.” Here’s how the Clinton administration reacted, according to the 9/11 Commission report:
The same day, [Counterterrorism Czar Richard] Clarke convened a meeting of his CSG [Counterterrorism Security Group] to discuss both the hijacking concern and the antiaircraft missile threat. To address the hijacking warning, the group agreed that New York airports should go to maximum security starting that weekend. They agreed to boost security at other East coast airports. The CIA agreed to distribute versions of the report to the FBI and FAA to pass to the New York Police Department and the airlines. The FAA issued a security directive on December 8, with specific requirements for more intensive air carrier screening of passengers and more oversight of the screening process, at all three New York area airports. [pg. 128-30]
On August 6, 2001, the Bush administration received a President’s Daily Brief entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S.” Here’s how the Bush administration reacted, according to the 9/11 Commission report:
[President Bush] did not recall discussing the August 6 report with the Attorney General or whether Rice had done so.[p. 260]
We have found no indication of any further discussion before September 11 among the President and his top advisers of the possibility of a threat of an al Qaeda attack in the United States. DCI Tenet visited President Bush in Crawford, Texas, on August 17 and participated in the PDB briefings of the President between August 31 (after the President had returned to Washington) and September 10. But Tenet does not recall any discussions with the President of the domestic threat during this period. [p. 262]

Answer 5

Is anything done so correctly that it can't be complained about?
And why are you always complaining about liberals? Don't you have anything better to do?

Answer 6

We aren't complaining about liberals. Which YOU'RE doing. If you don't like the whining, I have to wonder why you're doing it.

Answer 7

I stopped complaining....... it does no good.

The insanity will be over in about 18 months....I can wait.

Answer 8

Yes, Dubya's term is almost over and so is the end of the conservative coup...

Answer 9

Why complain, everything is great, go have a triple cheese burger, hop in the humvee, turn on Rush, and shout obcenities at people from different cultures you don't like.

Answer 10

It's called freedom of speach.