You can blame Bush for going in and removing the dictator that kept everyone, including the local thugs, in line, albeit by threat of death. You can blame Bush for not managing the peace as well as he managed the war. Blame Bush for mismanagement and perhaps faulty decisionmaking - but let's not forget that it's radical Islamic terrorists who are committing the suicide bombings - - if some guy murders your daughter do you say the police did it for not patrolling your neighborhood or the judge did it for giving the guy such a lax sentence for his last crime that he was on the street in time to kill your daughter? You're made at those people but you still say the criminal committed the crime.
I'm not saying Bush is perfect - far from it. But we're so busy infighting that we're forgetting our common enemy.
2007-03-06 02:05:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
not just terrorist. iraq is in a civil war. they are killing each other.
2007-03-06 02:10:28 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The troops could get out..it may were beter for easily everyone in the journey that that they had in no way lengthy gone in. they don't look bringing peace to the country, they have led to a civil conflict. yet with each and each of the propaganda on Iran, you'll presume they are construction bases to attack Iran in some months time. the project is Bush needs oil, and Iraq and Iran have the lightest crued, therefore the more good value to refine, and the more suitable income to the oil businesses. some will declare it`s no longer about oil. If that`s the case why are they boasting that they are literally coping with to get more suitable barrels in line with day than on the hieght of Saddams production..!!
2016-12-05 07:57:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I can Blame BUSH! We were going after terrorist that had something to do with 9/11, who Bush tried to tie to Iraq, which was a total fabrication!
We aren't fighting terrorist! We are fighting Iraqi's in a civil war!
The Iraqi people and the US would have been much better off if we had not illegally and unilaterally attacked a sovereign Nation against international law!
What common enemy! The Iraqis?
You think we cared that Saddam was a dictator? Wasn't it the CIA that were behind terrorist attacks in Iran which they blamed on an elected government so they could put the Shaw of Iran in Power!
Ever hear of Iran/Contra where we were convicted (Reagan) for illegally being behind attacks on a sovereign nation!
Bush went after people who had nothing to to with terrorist or 9/11! And his 4 year. longer than WW II, war has been an utter disaster. Our troops for the past 2 years or so are just target practice and we have one religious faction going after another one! Bush has had Body Bags coming home for Iraq for over 4 years daily. He had no plan, and only got one after the Democrats took over the Congress. Bush's backup plan to his current one is he does not have one!!
I blame no one but Bush!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tQeBNjjFbQ&mode=related&search=
2007-03-06 02:28:00 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are absolutly right. It's not the troops in Iraq that are creating the hate and discontent. It's TERRORISTS!
What puzzles me is why the anti war group thinks IF we pull out of Iraq now everything will be sweetness and light. Where did they ever come up with that idea? *LOL* And they accuse Bush of drinking and doing drugs.
2007-03-06 02:13:55 · answer #4 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yaay another spree of political questions
the "terrorists" are people unhappy with whats happening in Iraq and are obviously being misguided. The US needs to stop this supply of healthy young but misguided men (and women) before they do any harm
If the war may go on i say send more troops to close down the borders before civil war erupts
2007-03-06 10:52:29 · answer #5 · answered by da 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you, although I think 'terrorist' is the wrong word, it's mostly insurgents. It's so easy to just label our enemies as 'the terrorists' but it's really not accurate. Unfortunately, some people are still going to believe that all the bloodshed is our fault (directly).
2007-03-06 02:10:20 · answer #6 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I definately blame them. As someone who is here....These people are born killers and taught that murder is OK with Allah. They have no remorse or value for a non-believer. Even if they are killing fellow Islams, they hate each other and have for thousands of years. It is the culture. We cannot put our norms and values on it because it is apples and oranges. I believe they are nuts but that is based on my upbringing and morals. They feel they are ridding the world of infidels.
2007-03-06 02:12:33 · answer #7 · answered by dude0795 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You miss the point THEIR are AND have been fare worse dictators than Sodom.And we didn't go to war with them .This is bushes war .AND I think you should lead from the front .Busch and Cheney did not serve when it was their turn . but they send other men to die for something that cant be changed.
2007-03-06 02:23:29 · answer #8 · answered by lone wolfe 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is easier for the lieberals to defame Bush and embrace their new religion, Bushblame, than it is for them to actually address the problem of terrorism.
2007-03-06 02:10:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course they are, Al Quada is the scourge of the century
as well as all other terrorist organisations...............................
2007-03-06 02:09:51 · answer #10 · answered by gorglin 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋