I like his domestic policy but do you think he'd take the appropriate steps to ensure secure peace like invading anothing country?
2007-03-06 01:32:55 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No, he is a liar and a liberal hack. He could give a rats behind about the people, he is a rich boy and only in it for the money. On the protecting this country, no, he is another spineless Liberal. He would try to appease anyone who attacked us and allow them to do it again instead of taking them out where they stand like a real man would.
2007-03-06 01:43:17 · answer #1 · answered by Sane 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. I am from North Carolina and I cannot tell you one thing he did for our state when he was a US Senator for North Carolina. He hardly ever showed up for any of their Senate meetings!! He is nothing but a professional politician that only know how to grin like the Cheshire Cat. I think Sane's answer hit the nail on the head as far as Edwards is concerned. I can say this because I am a native North Carolinian from his home state and know he could have cared less for North Carolina. I don't expect any more from him as far as the rest of the country goes.
2007-03-06 02:15:03 · answer #2 · answered by Caleb's Mom 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i do not see him determining. at the starting up, he couldn't furnish North Carolina to Kerry in 2004, so it truly is questionable how a lot potential he classified ads to a cost ticket. 2d, it may be truly unusual to have an identical vice president from a dropping previous cost ticket on the pollagain as vice president. only sounds like the former day's stale bread. I also listen that he does unlike Hillary. i'm no longer particular how he and Obama get alongside. I understand a vice president and Pres do not could like one yet another - Kennedy and Johnson supposedly despised one yet another - besides the undeniable fact that it truly is an argument.
2016-12-05 07:54:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
John Edwards is a go with the flow kind of person , he would not make a good anything , I am from the same area he is from , I know many here that know him personally , and they are not even voting for him , he is another talker with no back bone to walk the walk
2007-03-06 03:30:18 · answer #4 · answered by Insensitively Honest 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. Only a president who has a strong regard for foreign policy would be a good Commander-In-Chief. That's why President George W. Bush has failed. He is only good in areas of domestic issues and Dick Cheney (what a joke) is good with foreign policy.
Look at former President Bill Clinton. He had strong regards for the foreign and international community while former Vice President Al Gore had strong regards for domestic policy.
That's why who ever wins their respective party's nomination, needs to balance out the ticket with the opposite of themselves.
2007-03-06 02:16:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Except for Bill Richardson, there isn't a Democratic candidate out there that would be a good Commander-in-Chief.
2007-03-06 01:42:38 · answer #6 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Only if you want an unscrupulous president in charge of the country
2007-03-06 03:39:18 · answer #7 · answered by H.C.Will 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't let him lead my dog let alone the military.
Yep, the nasty people will really respect that limp wristed PRETTY BOY.
He might hit them with his purse.
2007-03-06 07:25:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is not even qualified to be the attorney general
2007-03-06 03:45:51 · answer #9 · answered by csn0331 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ann Coulter hit it right on the head when she called him a ******.
2007-03-06 02:10:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋