There was no real evidence of the DUI. This took place in the state of Missouri.
2007-03-06 01:09:20 · 4 answers · asked by Metavia 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
This is a question for a lawyer that knows the specifics of your trial. I would assume that there was some evidence, considering this was the SIXTH DUI. However, all personal feelings aside, the appeals process is tied to the specific case. Were the attorneys competent? Was the jury influenced? Etc. Etc. Only a lawyer familiar with the trial would be able to determine if an appeal is warranted.
Someone with 6 DUI's should be locked up for attempted murder.
2007-03-06 01:16:20 · answer #1 · answered by Wango138 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about evidence of the other 5 DUIs?? Obviously this person is a danger to society, so he needs to be put somewhere where he doesn't have access to a vehicle or booze.
2007-03-06 01:13:15 · answer #2 · answered by J S 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If there was 'no evidence' then how did he get convicted?
Sounds like somebody is trying to avoid facing the consequences of their actions.
Besides, I would rather have that guy in prison than on the road.
2007-03-06 03:58:05 · answer #3 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You need to stop drinking and the only way to do this is go to jail and get sober Just go and you might come out with you man hood in tack if you don't drop the soup loser!!!
2007-03-06 01:18:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋