Just an observation, how the concept of time is agreed around the world and peace has not.
2007-03-06 00:30:54 · 5 answers · asked by MrSushiRoll 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Time is a fact, a dimension. An object is in a certain place at a certain time. If it is moved it is still in the same place in that time reference.
Peace is a concept that suffers from the vagaries of Mankind. A fact cannot be argued but a concept can.
2007-03-06 00:36:38 · answer #1 · answered by diogenese_97 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Peace can be achieved through time and collaboration. The inventor of time gave us time we have to do the rest.
2007-03-06 08:41:19 · answer #2 · answered by Natalia B 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Certain things just seem to be in us: awareness of the passage of time, gender attraction, enjoyment of music. But I don't think peace is one of them. Our main drives seem to be the 3F's: food, fighting and finding a mate. Nature seems to have saddled us with these things, and I don't think peace is on Nature's agenda.
If we were a rational species, we could overcome that drive. But we are not a rational species. We can DO rationality, but that's not what makes us go. (See the 3F's, above.)
Thank goodness for music . . .
2007-03-06 08:42:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He did, but we don't have to recognize either.
2007-03-06 09:14:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
sadly, during time, things, beings fight to prevail, they live, kill and die too.
2007-03-06 08:37:30 · answer #5 · answered by sofista 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋