English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

does it have to be nuclear or could it be solar,what do people think

2007-03-05 18:32:36 · 2 answers · asked by fatdadslim 6 in Social Science Economics

2 answers

nucular should go the way of the dinosaur! (too much energy spent diggin up the stuff to burn.)

We could put some solar/wind-farms out in the middle of the oceans.
We could put some solar out in space, (up out away from the paths of all the planets and other circling debris).
Or we could go with vortex energy! (If the megalopolies would let loose with their patents, or make use of them.) http://merlib.org/tag/vortex / http://merlib.org/tag/implosion

Then again, maybe the best is just fire.

2007-03-05 19:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by sincere12_26 4 · 0 1

Dog ****, refined dog ****, milled to a paste and squeezed between high-torsion grinders to emit natural gas for the purpose of aerial combustion.

2007-03-06 14:13:48 · answer #2 · answered by Veritatum17 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers