Absolutely. All of my daughters had them until their wedding night.
2007-03-05 17:10:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by SafetyDancer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its quite often a Pentecostal point of view. They take the scripture that a guy shouldn't embellish womans cloths and vise versa. i could say the Irish have a difficulty with kilts then. besides, in spite of the reality that I nonetheless have self belief Pentecostals have a greater employer grip on the certainty, yet i think they lack in this one. Jesus says come as you're. Now there's a distinction in womans pants and mens pants, i do no longer think of a guy ought to gown in drag. In Jesus day, while the bible replaced into written replaced into there this manner of factor as pants? i thought there have been roman kilts, and all and sundry else wore gowns. while have been pants invented?. desire this facilitates
2016-12-14 11:58:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope
2007-03-05 17:46:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Probably, but then, how would they pee?
And if they actually can take it off, then what's the point of the belt?
Someone has been watching
Princess Bride tooo many times!
2007-03-05 18:05:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by BadGirlGimpy 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. They need to keep their legs closed. And as for guys, they need to keep their pants zipped up.
2007-03-05 17:30:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by SAK 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Only if they need one to hold their pants up.
2007-03-05 17:08:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by cassandra 6
·
1⤊
0⤋